These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36154263)

  • 1. The role of glimpses with different energy in speech-in-noise recognition.
    Tang Y
    JASA Express Lett; 2022 Feb; 2(2):025201. PubMed ID: 36154263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spectro-temporal modulation glimpsing for speech intelligibility prediction.
    Edraki A; Chan WY; Jensen J; Fogerty D
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108620. PubMed ID: 36175300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glimpsing speech in temporally and spectro-temporally modulated noise.
    Fogerty D; Carter BL; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):3047. PubMed ID: 29857753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise.
    Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1562-73. PubMed ID: 16583901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spectro-temporal glimpsing of speech in noise: Regularity and coherence of masking patterns reduces uncertainty and increases intelligibility.
    Fogerty D; Sevich VA; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Sep; 148(3):1552. PubMed ID: 33003879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of speech glimpsing in synchronously and asynchronously modulated noise.
    Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3594-600. PubMed ID: 24907822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of reliable interaural time difference cues in ambiguous binaural signals for the intelligibility of multitalker speech.
    Schoenmaker E; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):4041. PubMed ID: 32611159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech: Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners.
    Bhargava P; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 17(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 27090115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Intelligibility of Time-Compressed Speech Is Correlated with the Ability to Listen in Modulated Noise.
    Gransier R; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Jun; 23(3):413-426. PubMed ID: 35257274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors influencing glimpsing of speech in noise.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1165-72. PubMed ID: 17672662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Explaining intelligibility in speech-modulated maskers using acoustic glimpse analysis.
    Gibbs BE; Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):EL449. PubMed ID: 29960446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contribution of binaural masking release to improved speech intelligibility for different masker types.
    Sutojo S; van de Par S; Schoenmaker E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 51(5):1339-1352. PubMed ID: 29855098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech: Extension to spectro-temporal modulation and glimpsing.
    Stone MA; Canavan S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):832. PubMed ID: 27586715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech Intelligibility as a Cue for Acceptable Noise Levels.
    Recker KL; Micheyl C
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):465-474. PubMed ID: 28169839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acceptable range of speech level in noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
    Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1411-9. PubMed ID: 21895082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Apoux F; Yoho SE; Youngdahl CL; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2205-12. PubMed ID: 23967950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Better-ear glimpsing efficiency with symmetrically-placed interfering talkers.
    Brungart DS; Iyer N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2545-56. PubMed ID: 23039448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.