264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36154284)
1. Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Pötsch N; Vatteroni G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Radiology; 2022 Oct; 305(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 36154284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can supplementary contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast avoid needle biopsies in suspicious microcalcifications seen on mammography? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fueger BJ; Clauser P; Kapetas P; Pötsch N; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Breast; 2021 Apr; 56():53-60. PubMed ID: 33618160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study.
Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Hoernig M; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 32061002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Performance of Contrast-enhanced Mammography, Abbreviated Breast MRI, and Standard Breast MRI for Breast Cancer Screening.
Lawson MB; Partridge SC; Hippe DS; Rahbar H; Lam DL; Lee CI; Lowry KP; Scheel JR; Parsian S; Li I; Biswas D; Bryant ML; Lee JM
Radiology; 2023 Aug; 308(2):e230576. PubMed ID: 37581498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: Contrast-enhanced mammography versus contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shahraki Z; Ghaffari M; Nakhaie Moghadam M; Parooie F; Salarzaei M
Breast Dis; 2022; 41(1):303-315. PubMed ID: 35754256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic contrast-enhanced mammography and breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer and detection of tumor size.
Tekinhatun M; Sabir N; Erdem E; Yilmaz S; Ufuk F
Turk J Med Sci; 2024; 54(1):249-261. PubMed ID: 38812642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
Sumkin JH; Berg WA; Carter GJ; Bandos AI; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Zuley ML; Houshmand G; Anello MI; Gur D
Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):531-540. PubMed ID: 31660801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Head-to-head comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI for assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.
Kaiyin M; Lingling T; Leilei T; Wenjia L; Bin J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Nov; 202(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 37615793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI.
Wienbeck S; Fischer U; Luftner-Nagel S; Lotz J; Uhlig J
Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3731-3741. PubMed ID: 29594402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhancement Type at Contrast-enhanced Mammography and Association with Malignancy.
Kim G; Mehta TS; Brook A; Du LH; Legare K; Phillips J
Radiology; 2022 Nov; 305(2):299-306. PubMed ID: 35819328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Gelardi F; Ragaini EM; Sollini M; Bernardi D; Chiti A
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 36010240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer.
Warner E; Messersmith H; Causer P; Eisen A; Shumak R; Plewes D
Ann Intern Med; 2008 May; 148(9):671-9. PubMed ID: 18458280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance.
Cozzi A; Magni V; Zanardo M; Schiaffino S; Sardanelli F
Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):568-581. PubMed ID: 34904875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast BI-RADS 4 Microcalcification-Only Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Long R; Cao K; Cao M; Li XT; Gao F; Zhang FD; Yu YZ; Sun YS
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(3):256-262.e2. PubMed ID: 33243676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions.
Rong X; Kang Y; Xue J; Han P; Li Z; Yang G; Shi G
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7439-7447. PubMed ID: 35639141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR Imaging for Diagnosis of Malignancy in Mammographic Microcalcifications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bennani-Baiti B; Baltzer PA
Radiology; 2017 Jun; 283(3):692-701. PubMed ID: 27788035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Conventional Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study.
Kim G; Phillips J; Cole E; Brook A; Mehta T; Slanetz P; Fishman MDC; Karimova E; Mehta R; Lotfi P; Resteghini N; Raj S; Dialani V
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Oct; 16(10):1456-1463. PubMed ID: 31092346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study.
Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Ryden L; Zackrisson S
BMC Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1115. PubMed ID: 34663236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists.
Neuschler EI; Butler R; Young CA; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Donlan P; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Lavin PT; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Schilling KJ; Tucker FL; Dogan BE
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 29178816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus MRI for breast cancer staging: detection of additional malignant lesions not seen on conventional imaging.
Taylor DB; Burrows S; Saunders CM; Parizel PM; Ives A
Eur Radiol Exp; 2023 Feb; 7(1):8. PubMed ID: 36781808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
