These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36154350)

  • 21. The Electoral Consequences of Affective Polarization? Negative Voting in the 2020 US Presidential Election.
    Garzia D; Ferreira da Silva F
    Am Polit Res; 2022 May; 50(3):303-311. PubMed ID: 35469326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Post-election survey data: Local democracy and the 2018 local elections in the Czech Republic.
    Šaradín P; Lebeda T; Lysek J; Soukop M; Ostrá D; Lebedová E
    Data Brief; 2021 Jun; 36():107039. PubMed ID: 34013001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. (Un)happiness and voting in U.S. presidential elections.
    Ward G; De Neve JE; Ungar LH; Eichstaedt JC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Feb; 120(2):370-383. PubMed ID: 32700960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Introducing the Democratic Electoral Systems data, 1919-1945.
    Bormann NC; Kaftan L
    Open Res Eur; 2024; 4():73. PubMed ID: 39148582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Dynamics of Electoral Manipulation and Institutional Trust in Democracies: Election Timing, Blatant Fraud, and the Legitimacy of Governance.
    Higashijima M; Kadoya H; Yanai Y
    Public Opin Q; 2024; 88(SI):472-494. PubMed ID: 39109089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Not every dissatisfaction is the same: The impact of electoral regret, disappointment, and anger on subsequent electoral behavior.
    Tunç MN; Brandt MJ; Zeelenberg M
    Emotion; 2023 Mar; 23(2):554-568. PubMed ID: 35446054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. 280 characters to the White House: predicting 2020 U.S. presidential elections from twitter data.
    Rizk R; Rizk D; Rizk F; Hsu S
    Comput Math Organ Theory; 2023 Mar; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 37360912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [COVID-19 Pandemic and Political Institutions].
    Kersting N
    Polit Vierteljahresschr; 2021; 62(2):325-339. PubMed ID: 33551493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating mail-based security for electoral processes using attack trees.
    Scala NM; Goethals PL; Dehlinger J; Mezgebe Y; Jilcha B; Bloomquist I
    Risk Anal; 2022 Oct; 42(10):2327-2343. PubMed ID: 35072977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The politics of health care reforms in U.S. presidential elections.
    Navarro V
    Int J Health Serv; 2008; 38(4):597-606. PubMed ID: 19069282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dataset of Historical Elections in Catalonia (DHEC): Micro-level Historical Results (1890-1923).
    Vall-Prat P
    Data Brief; 2021 Jun; 36():107017. PubMed ID: 33937453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. County community health associations of net voting shift in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Wasfy JH; Stewart C; Bhambhani V
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185051. PubMed ID: 28968415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Not by turnout alone: Measuring the sources of electoral change, 2012 to 2016.
    Hill SJ; Hopkins DJ; Huber GA
    Sci Adv; 2021 Apr; 7(17):. PubMed ID: 33883131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The costs of electoral fraud: establishing the link between electoral integrity, winning an election, and satisfaction with democracy.
    Fortin-Rittberger J; Harfst P; Dingler SC
    J Elect Public Opin Parties; 2017 Jul; 27(3):350-368. PubMed ID: 28824703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Electoral Misinformation Nexus: How News Consumption, Platform Use, and Trust in News Influence Belief in Electoral Misinformation.
    Mont'Alverne C; Arguedas AR; Banerjee S; Toff B; Fletcher R; Nielsen RK
    Public Opin Q; 2024; 88(SI):681-707. PubMed ID: 39109090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The forensics of fraud: Evidence from the 2018 Brazilian presidential election.
    Figueiredo Filho D; Silva L; Carvalho E
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 5():100286. PubMed ID: 36176631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spanish electoral archive. SEA database.
    Pérez V; Aybar C; Pavía JM
    Sci Data; 2021 Jul; 8(1):193. PubMed ID: 34321488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The perspectives of people with intellectual disabilities on their experience of voting in UK general elections.
    Manktelow N; Chadwick DD; Brewster S; Tilly L
    J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2023 May; 36(3):629-640. PubMed ID: 36918746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of 2020 French municipal elections on the spread of COVID-19.
    Cassan G; Sangnier M
    J Popul Econ; 2022; 35(3):963-988. PubMed ID: 35345551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Universality in voting behavior: an empirical analysis.
    Chatterjee A; Mitrović M; Fortunato S
    Sci Rep; 2013; 3():1049. PubMed ID: 23308342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.