These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36154643)

  • 1. Costs of dynamic cocktail party listening: Investigating the effects of cognitive abilities and hearing impairment.
    Wächtler M; Kessler J; Walger M; Meister H
    JASA Express Lett; 2021 Jul; 1(7):075201. PubMed ID: 36154643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revealing Perceptional and Cognitive Mechanisms in Static and Dynamic Cocktail Party Listening by Means of Error Analyses.
    Wächtler M; Kessler J; Walger M; Meister H
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221111676. PubMed ID: 35849353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Static and dynamic cocktail party listening in younger and older adults.
    Meister H; Wenzel F; Gehlen AK; Kessler J; Walger M
    Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 395():108020. PubMed ID: 32698114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suprathreshold Differences in Competing Speech Perception in Older Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing.
    Venezia JH; Leek MR; Lindeman MP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2141-2161. PubMed ID: 32603618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
    Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Swaminathan J
    Trends Hear; 2015 Jun; 19():. PubMed ID: 26126896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The advantage of knowing the talker.
    Souza P; Gehani N; Wright R; McCloy D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):689-700. PubMed ID: 24131605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Talker identification: Effects of masking, hearing loss, and age.
    Best V; Ahlstrom JB; Mason CR; Roverud E; Perrachione TK; Kidd G; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):1085. PubMed ID: 29495693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aging and speech-on-speech masking.
    Helfer KS; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 18091104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial release of cognitive load measured in a dual-task paradigm in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Xia J; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):1888-98. PubMed ID: 25920841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited.
    Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aided speech-identification performance in single-talker competition by older adults with impaired hearing.
    Humes LE; Coughlin M
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):485-94. PubMed ID: 19778396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cocktail party listening in a dynamic multitalker environment.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Jan; 69(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 17515218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Hearing Loss and Cognitive Load on Speech Recognition with Competing Talkers.
    Meister H; Schreitmüller S; Ortmann M; Rählmann S; Walger M
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():301. PubMed ID: 26973585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.