These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36154950)

  • 1. I am entitled to it! Social power and context modulate disadvantageous inequity aversion.
    Hou Q; Meng L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2022 Nov; 181():150-159. PubMed ID: 36154950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. You did not mean it: Perceived good intentions alleviate sense of unfairness.
    Ma Q; Meng L; Zhang Z; Xu Q; Wang Y; Shen Q
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jun; 96(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 25863263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The time course of neural responses to social versus non-social unfairness in the ultimatum game.
    Chen M; Zhao Z; Lai H
    Soc Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 14(4):409-419. PubMed ID: 29883547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an ERP study.
    Qu C; Wang Y; Huang Y
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():505. PubMed ID: 23986686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Counterfactual comparison modulates fairness consideration in the mini-ultimatum game: an event-related potentials study.
    Liang J; Lin H; Xiang J; Wu H; Li X; Liang H; Zheng X
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Apr; 56(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 25586113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Social value orientation modulates context-based social comparison preference in the outcome evaluation: An ERP study.
    Qi Y; Wu H; Raiha S; Liu X
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():135-144. PubMed ID: 29501790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The neural correlate of mid-value offers in ultimatum game.
    Zhong X; Wang R; Huang S; Chen J; Chen H; Qu C
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220622. PubMed ID: 31430295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moral transgression modulates fairness considerations in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERP and EEG data.
    Chen T; Tang R; Yang X; Peng M; Cai M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2023 Jun; 188():1-11. PubMed ID: 36889599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining.
    Li Q; Dai W; Zheng Y; Wang C; Yang Z; Ren Q; Hu K; Liu X
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Sep; 174():108318. PubMed ID: 35830915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hello handsome! Male's facial attractiveness gives rise to female's fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios-An ERP study.
    Ma Q; Qian D; Hu L; Wang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180459. PubMed ID: 28678888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beauty matters: social preferences in a three-person ultimatum game.
    Ma Q; Hu Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125806. PubMed ID: 25951138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased neural responses to unfairness in a loss context.
    Guo X; Zheng L; Zhu L; Li J; Wang Q; Dienes Z; Yang Z
    Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 77():246-53. PubMed ID: 23562770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Altered behavioral and electrophysiological responses to social fairness in manic and euthymic patients with bipolar disorder.
    Ryu V; Ha RY; Cho HS
    Brain Behav; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e2289. PubMed ID: 34291610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception.
    Wang A; Zhu L; Lyu D; Cai D; Ma Q; Jin J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 22(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 34374029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social distance and anonymity modulate fairness consideration: An ERP study.
    Yu R; Hu P; Zhang P
    Sci Rep; 2015 Aug; 5():13452. PubMed ID: 26293456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intention affects fairness processing: Evidence from behavior and representational similarity analysis of event-related potential signals.
    Xu Q; Hu J; Qin Y; Li G; Zhang X; Li P
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Apr; 44(6):2451-2464. PubMed ID: 36749642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study.
    Ma Q; Hu Y; Jiang S; Meng L
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():77. PubMed ID: 25805967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: evidence from behavior and brain potentials.
    Hu X; Mai X
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 16(7):670-682. PubMed ID: 33769539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.