538 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36155098)
1. The effect of culture conditions on the bone regeneration potential of osteoblast-laden 3D bioprinted constructs.
Raveendran N; Ivanovski S; Vaquette C
Acta Biomater; 2023 Jan; 156():190-201. PubMed ID: 36155098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D bioprinting of DPSCs with GelMA hydrogel of various concentrations for bone regeneration.
Wang W; Zhu Y; Liu Y; Chen B; Li M; Yuan C; Wang P
Tissue Cell; 2024 Jun; 88():102418. PubMed ID: 38776731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bioprinting EphrinB2-Modified Dental Pulp Stem Cells with Enhanced Osteogenic Capacity for Alveolar Bone Engineering.
Wang W; Zhu Y; Li J; Geng T; Jia J; Wang X; Yuan C; Wang P
Tissue Eng Part A; 2023 Apr; 29(7-8):244-255. PubMed ID: 36606680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrically stimulated 3D bioprinting of gelatin-polypyrrole hydrogel with dynamic semi-IPN network induces osteogenesis via collective signaling and immunopolarization.
Dutta SD; Ganguly K; Randhawa A; Patil TV; Patel DK; Lim KT
Biomaterials; 2023 Mar; 294():121999. PubMed ID: 36669301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tomographic volumetric bioprinting of heterocellular bone-like tissues in seconds.
Gehlen J; Qiu W; Schädli GN; Müller R; Qin XH
Acta Biomater; 2023 Jan; 156():49-60. PubMed ID: 35718102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of mechanical stiffness and cell density of 3D bioprinted cell-laden scaffolds improves extracellular matrix mineralization and cellular organization for bone tissue engineering.
Zhang J; Wehrle E; Adamek P; Paul GR; Qin XH; Rubert M; Müller R
Acta Biomater; 2020 Sep; 114():307-322. PubMed ID: 32673752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D-bioprinted functional and biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds incorporated with nanosilicates to promote bone healing in rat calvarial defect model.
Liu B; Li J; Lei X; Cheng P; Song Y; Gao Y; Hu J; Wang C; Zhang S; Li D; Wu H; Sang H; Bi L; Pei G
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Jul; 112():110905. PubMed ID: 32409059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioprinted anisotropic scaffolds with fast stress relaxation bioink for engineering 3D skeletal muscle and repairing volumetric muscle loss.
Li T; Hou J; Wang L; Zeng G; Wang Z; Yu L; Yang Q; Yin J; Long M; Chen L; Chen S; Zhang H; Li Y; Wu Y; Huang W
Acta Biomater; 2023 Jan; 156():21-36. PubMed ID: 36002128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D bioprinting of graphene oxide-incorporated cell-laden bone mimicking scaffolds for promoting scaffold fidelity, osteogenic differentiation and mineralization.
Zhang J; Eyisoylu H; Qin XH; Rubert M; Müller R
Acta Biomater; 2021 Feb; 121():637-652. PubMed ID: 33326888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bioprinted PDLSCs with high-concentration GelMA hydrogels exhibit enhanced osteogenic differentiation in vitro and promote bone regeneration in vivo.
Zhu Y; Wang W; Chen Q; Ren T; Yang J; Li G; Qi Y; Yuan C; Wang P
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):5153-5170. PubMed ID: 37428274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of cell-laden photopolymerized constructs with bioactive amorphous calcium magnesium phosphate for bone tissue regeneration via 3D bioprinting.
Kim JY; Kumar SB; Park CH; Kim CS
Int J Biol Macromol; 2024 May; 267(Pt 2):131412. PubMed ID: 38593894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D bioprinting of mouse pre-osteoblasts and human MSCs using bioinks consisting of gelatin and decellularized bone particles.
Kara Özenler A; Distler T; Akkineni AR; Tihminlioglu F; Gelinsky M; Boccaccini AR
Biofabrication; 2024 Mar; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 38394672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hybrid biofabrication of 3D osteoconductive constructs comprising Mg-based nanocomposites and cell-laden bioinks for bone repair.
Alcala-Orozco CR; Mutreja I; Cui X; Hooper GJ; Lim KS; Woodfield TBF
Bone; 2022 Jan; 154():116198. PubMed ID: 34534709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioprinted Osteogenic and Vasculogenic Patterns for Engineering 3D Bone Tissue.
Byambaa B; Annabi N; Yue K; Trujillo-de Santiago G; Alvarez MM; Jia W; Kazemzadeh-Narbat M; Shin SR; Tamayol A; Khademhosseini A
Adv Healthc Mater; 2017 Aug; 6(16):. PubMed ID: 28524375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D bioprinted small extracellular vesicles from periodontal cells enhance mesenchymal stromal cell function.
Han P; Raveendran N; Liu C; Basu S; Jiao K; Johnson N; Moran CS; Ivanovski S
Biomater Adv; 2024 Apr; 158():213770. PubMed ID: 38242057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D Bioprinting of a Bioactive Composite Scaffold for Cell Delivery in Periodontal Tissue Regeneration.
Miao G; Liang L; Li W; Ma C; Pan Y; Zhao H; Zhang Q; Xiao Y; Yang X
Biomolecules; 2023 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37509098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. GelMA/bioactive silica nanocomposite bioinks for stem cell osteogenic differentiation.
Tavares MT; Gaspar VM; Monteiro MV; S Farinha JP; Baleizão C; Mano JF
Biofabrication; 2021 Apr; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33455952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osteogenic Differentiation of Three-Dimensional Bioprinted Constructs Consisting of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells In Vitro and In Vivo.
Wang XF; Song Y; Liu YS; Sun YC; Wang YG; Wang Y; Lyu PJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157214. PubMed ID: 27332814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Alginate-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting and Fabrication of Anatomically Accurate Bone Grafts.
Gonzalez-Fernandez T; Tenorio AJ; Campbell KT; Silva EA; Leach JK
Tissue Eng Part A; 2021 Sep; 27(17-18):1168-1181. PubMed ID: 33218292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aspiration-assisted bioprinting of co-cultured osteogenic spheroids for bone tissue engineering.
Heo DN; Ayan B; Dey M; Banerjee D; Wee H; Lewis GS; Ozbolat IT
Biofabrication; 2020 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 33059343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
