These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36155112)

  • 1. Preeclampsia information on the internet: An application of five readability tests.
    Samuel L; Fera J; Basch CH
    Pregnancy Hypertens; 2022 Dec; 30():110-112. PubMed ID: 36155112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readability of online material related to skin cancer.
    Basch CH; Fera J; Ethan D; Garcia P; Perin D; Basch CE
    Public Health; 2018 Oct; 163():137-140. PubMed ID: 30149263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
    Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
    JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readability of influenza information online: Implications for consumer health.
    Basch CH; Fera J; Garcia P
    Am J Infect Control; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1298-1301. PubMed ID: 31253552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Basch CH; Ethan D; MacLean SA; Fera J; Garcia P; Basch CE
    Am J Mens Health; 2018 Sep; 12(5):1665-1669. PubMed ID: 29888641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Voice Disorders.
    Dueppen AJ; Bellon-Harn ML; Radhakrishnan N; Manchaiah V
    J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 29254598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative readability analysis of websites providing information on traumatic brain injury and epilepsy: A need for clear communication.
    Correa DJ; Milano L; Kwon CS; Jetté N; Dlugos D; Harte-Hargrove L; Pugh MJ; Smith JK; Moshé SL
    Epilepsia; 2020 Mar; 61(3):528-538. PubMed ID: 32096225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy.
    McInnes N; Haglund BJ
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2011 Dec; 36(4):173-89. PubMed ID: 21332302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
    Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Readability of consumer health information on the internet: a comparison of U.S. government-funded and commercially funded websites.
    Risoldi Cochrane Z; Gregory P; Wilson A
    J Health Commun; 2012; 17(9):1003-10. PubMed ID: 22512714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality and readability of English-language internet information for aphasia.
    Azios JH; Bellon-Harn M; Dockens AL; Manchaiah V
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2019 Feb; 21(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 28805470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anxiety and COVID-19: A study of online content readability.
    Seidel EJ; Hillyer GC; Basch CH
    J Prev Interv Community; 2021; 49(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 33871313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
    Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument.
    Kaicker J; Borg Debono V; Dang W; Buckley N; Thabane L
    BMC Med; 2010 Oct; 8():59. PubMed ID: 20939875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readability of Online Health Information: A Meta-Narrative Systematic Review.
    Daraz L; Morrow AS; Ponce OJ; Farah W; Katabi A; Majzoub A; Seisa MO; Benkhadra R; Alsawas M; Larry P; Murad MH
    Am J Med Qual; 2018; 33(5):487-492. PubMed ID: 29345143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing quality and readability of online English language information to patient use and perspectives for common rheumatologic conditions.
    Willen RD; Pipitone O; Daudfar S; Jones JD
    Rheumatol Int; 2020 Dec; 40(12):2097-2103. PubMed ID: 32772132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readability and quality of online eating disorder information-Are they sufficient? A systematic review evaluating websites on anorexia nervosa using DISCERN and Flesch Readability.
    Arts H; Lemetyinen H; Edge D
    Int J Eat Disord; 2020 Jan; 53(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 31589331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
    O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality and Readability Assessment of Internet-Based Information on Common Prosthodontic Treatments.
    Alshehri A; Alghofaili N; ALshunaiber R; Alkadi L
    Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):62–67. PubMed ID: 33651024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.