131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36155370)
1. A randomised control trial of intraoperative and early outcome in scalpel versus monopolar diathermy for midline abdominal incisions.
Igwe PO; Dodiyi-Manuel A; Wichendu PN
S Afr J Surg; 2022 Sep; 60(3):167-170. PubMed ID: 36155370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cutting diathermy versus scalpel for skin incision.
Ly J; Mittal A; Windsor J
Br J Surg; 2012 May; 99(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 22367850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scalpel versus diathermy skin incision in Caesarean section.
AbdElaal NK; Ellakwa HE; Elhalaby AF; Shaheen AE; Aish AH
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Apr; 39(3):340-344. PubMed ID: 30634889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical outcome of cutting diathermy versus scalpel skin incisions in uncomplicated appendectomy: A comparative study.
Okereke CE; Katung AI; Adesunkanmi AK; Alatise OI
Niger Postgrad Med J; 2019; 26(2):100-105. PubMed ID: 31187749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy.
Kearns SR; Connolly EM; McNally S; McNamara DA; Deasy J
Br J Surg; 2001 Jan; 88(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 11136307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cautery versus scalpel for abdominal skin incisions: a double blind, randomized crossover trial of scar cosmesis.
Stupart DA; Sim FW; Chan ZH; Guest GD; Watters DA
ANZ J Surg; 2016 Apr; 86(4):303-6. PubMed ID: 24165306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized double-blind trial comparing the cosmetic outcome of cutting diathermy versus scalpel for skin incisions.
Aird LN; Bristol SG; Phang PT; Raval MJ; Brown CJ
Br J Surg; 2015 Apr; 102(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 25692789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diathermy vs. scalpel skin incisions in general surgery: double-blind, randomized, clinical trial.
Shamim M
World J Surg; 2009 Aug; 33(8):1594-9. PubMed ID: 19418093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diathermy versus scalpel for skin incision in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Maw A
Int J Surg; 2020 Mar; 75():35-43. PubMed ID: 31978649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective study comparing diathermy and scalpel incisions in tension-free inguinal hernioplasty.
Chrysos E; Athanasakis E; Antonakakis S; Xynos E; Zoras O
Am Surg; 2005 Apr; 71(4):326-9. PubMed ID: 15943407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A multicentre collaborative study on the use of cold scalpel and electrocautery for midline abdominal incision.
Franchi M; Ghezzi F; Benedetti-Panici PL; Melpignano M; Fallo L; Tateo S; Maggi R; Scambia G; Mangili G; Buttarelli M
Am J Surg; 2001 Feb; 181(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 11425052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized, clinical trial on diathermy and scalpel incisions in elective general surgery.
Talpur AA; Khaskheli AB; Kella N; Jamal A
Iran Red Crescent Med J; 2015 Feb; 17(2):e14078. PubMed ID: 25834739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scalpel Versus Diathermy in Wound Healing After Mucosal Incisions: A Split-Mouth Study.
Wahab PUA; Madhulaxmi M; Senthilnathan P; Muthusekhar MR; Vohra Y; Abhinav RP
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 76(6):1160-1164. PubMed ID: 29406253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of superficial surgical site infection following use of diathermy and scalpel for making skin incision in inguinal hernioplasty.
Ali Q; Siddique K; Mirza S; Malik AZ
Niger J Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 12(4):371-4. PubMed ID: 20329674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diathermy versus Scalpel Incision in a Heterogeneous Cohort of General Surgery Patients in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital.
Ayandipo OO; Afuwape OO; Irabor D; Oluwatosin OM; Odigie V
Niger J Surg; 2015; 21(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 25838766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diathermy versus scalpel in transverse abdominal incision in women undergoing repeated cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial.
Elbohoty AE; Gomaa MF; Abdelaleim M; Abd-El-Gawad M; Elmarakby M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1541-6. PubMed ID: 26446416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cutting electrocautery versus scalpel for surgical incisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ismail A; Abushouk AI; Elmaraezy A; Menshawy A; Menshawy E; Ismail M; Samir E; Khaled A; Zakarya H; El-Tonoby A; Ghanem E
J Surg Res; 2017 Dec; 220():147-163. PubMed ID: 29180177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scalpel versus electrosurgery for abdominal incisions.
Charoenkwan K; Chotirosniramit N; Rerkasem K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jun; (6):CD005987. PubMed ID: 22696355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Pain Following the Use of Scalpel versus Diathermy for Skin Incision in Ear, Nose, Throat and Head and Neck Surgeries.
Shrestha D
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2018 Mar; 16(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 29717291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scalpel versus diathermy of midline skin incisions: comparison of mean pain scores on second post-operative day.
Saeed S; Ali A; Zainab S; Junaid Khan MT
J Pak Med Assoc; 2017 Oct; 67(10):1502-1505. PubMed ID: 28955064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
