345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36156440)
1. Automated analysis of three-dimensional CBCT images taken in natural head position that combines facial profile processing and multiple deep-learning models.
Ahn J; Nguyen TP; Kim YJ; Kim T; Yoon J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Nov; 226():107123. PubMed ID: 36156440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The accuracy of a designed software for automated localization of craniofacial landmarks on CBCT images.
Shahidi S; Bahrampour E; Soltanimehr E; Zamani A; Oshagh M; Moattari M; Mehdizadeh A
BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Sep; 14():32. PubMed ID: 25223399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A deep learning algorithm proposal to automatic pharyngeal airway detection and segmentation on CBCT images.
Sin Ç; Akkaya N; Aksoy S; Orhan K; Öz U
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Dec; 24 Suppl 2():117-123. PubMed ID: 33619828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of deep learning-based integrated tooth models by merging intraoral scans and CBCT scans for 3D evaluation of root position during orthodontic treatment.
Lee SC; Hwang HS; Lee KC
Prog Orthod; 2022 May; 23(1):15. PubMed ID: 35527317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Layered deep learning for automatic mandibular segmentation in cone-beam computed tomography.
Verhelst PJ; Smolders A; Beznik T; Meewis J; Vandemeulebroucke A; Shaheen E; Van Gerven A; Willems H; Politis C; Jacobs R
J Dent; 2021 Nov; 114():103786. PubMed ID: 34425172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults.
Maspero C; Abate A; Bellincioni F; Cavagnetto D; Lanteri V; Costa A; Farronato M
Prog Orthod; 2019 Oct; 20(1):40. PubMed ID: 31631241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images.
Lee JH; Lee NK; Zou B; Park JH; Choi TH
J Vis Exp; 2024 Feb; (204):. PubMed ID: 38465926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography definition of the anatomical subregions of the upper airway: a validation study.
Guijarro-Martínez R; Swennen GR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1140-9. PubMed ID: 23623785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Localization of Craniomaxillofacial Landmarks on CBCT Images Using 3D Mask R-CNN and Local Dependency Learning.
Lang Y; Lian C; Xiao D; Deng H; Thung KH; Yuan P; Gateno J; Kuang T; Alfi DM; Wang L; Shen D; Xia JJ; Yap PT
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2022 Oct; 41(10):2856-2866. PubMed ID: 35544487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cephalometric measurements performed on CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalograms: a cross-sectional study providing a quantitative approach of differences and bias.
Baldini B; Cavagnetto D; Baselli G; Sforza C; Tartaglia GM
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Mar; 22(1):98. PubMed ID: 35351080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.
Katkar RA; Kummet C; Dawson D; Moreno Uribe L; Allareddy V; Finkelstein M; Ruprecht A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130059. PubMed ID: 23833319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deep learning for detection and 3D segmentation of maxillofacial bone lesions in cone beam CT.
Yeshua T; Ladyzhensky S; Abu-Nasser A; Abdalla-Aslan R; Boharon T; Itzhak-Pur A; Alexander A; Chaurasia A; Cohen A; Sosna J; Leichter I; Nadler C
Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; 33(11):7507-7518. PubMed ID: 37191921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated measurement for image distortion analysis in 2D panoramic imaging of dental CBCT system: A phantom study.
Rabba JA; Suhaimi FM; Mat Jafri MZ; Jaafar HA; Osman ND
Radiography (Lond); 2023 May; 29(3):533-538. PubMed ID: 36913788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
Baumgaertel S; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
