356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36157395)
21. Comparison of raw accelerometry data from ActiGraph, Apple Watch, Garmin, and Fitbit using a mechanical shaker table.
White JW; Finnegan OL; Tindall N; Nelakuditi S; Brown DE; Pate RR; Welk GJ; de Zambotti M; Ghosal R; Wang Y; Burkart S; Adams EL; Chandrashekhar M; Armstrong B; Beets MW; Weaver RG
PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0286898. PubMed ID: 38551940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.
Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of Consumer-Wearable Activity Tracker-Based Programs on Objectively Measured Daily Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Among School-Aged Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Casado-Robles C; Viciana J; Guijarro-Romero S; Mayorga-Vega D
Sports Med Open; 2022 Jan; 8(1):18. PubMed ID: 35099630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluating the Validity of Current Mainstream Wearable Devices in Fitness Tracking Under Various Physical Activities: Comparative Study.
Xie J; Wen D; Liang L; Jia Y; Gao L; Lei J
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Apr; 6(4):e94. PubMed ID: 29650506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Validity of MotionSense HRV in Estimating Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity under Free-Living and Simulated Activity Settings.
Kwon S; Wan N; Burns RD; Brusseau TA; Kim Y; Kumar S; Ertin E; Wetter DW; Lam CY; Wen M; Byun W
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Feb; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 33670507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of consumer-level and research-grade activity trackers in ambulatory settings in older adults.
Tedesco S; Sica M; Ancillao A; Timmons S; Barton J; O'Flynn B
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216891. PubMed ID: 31112585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validity, Reliability and Sensitivity to Change of Three Consumer-Grade Activity Trackers in Controlled and Free-Living Conditions among Older Adults.
Kastelic K; Dobnik M; Löfler S; Hofer C; Šarabon N
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 34577457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reliability and Validity of Ten Consumer Activity Trackers Depend on Walking Speed.
Fokkema T; Kooiman TJ; Krijnen WP; VAN DER Schans CP; DE Groot M
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Apr; 49(4):793-800. PubMed ID: 28319983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of Polar Active Watch and Waist- and Wrist-Worn ActiGraph Accelerometers for Measuring Children's Physical Activity Levels during Unstructured Afterschool Programs.
Kim Y; Lochbaum M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Oct; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30332785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Validity and Reliability Evaluation of Four Commercial Activity Trackers' Step Counting Performance.
Tophøj KH; Petersen MG; Sæbye C; Baad-Hansen T; Wagner S
Telemed J E Health; 2018 Sep; 24(9):669-677. PubMed ID: 29303680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Accuracy of Smart Devices for Measuring Physical Activity in Daily Life: Validation Study.
Degroote L; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Verloigne M; Poppe L; Crombez G
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Dec; 6(12):e10972. PubMed ID: 30545810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Measuring Free-Living Physical Activity With Three Commercially Available Activity Monitors for Telemonitoring Purposes: Validation Study.
Breteler MJ; Janssen JH; Spiering W; Kalkman CJ; van Solinge WW; Dohmen DA
JMIR Form Res; 2019 Apr; 3(2):e11489. PubMed ID: 31017587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Step-count outcomes of 13 different activity trackers: Results from laboratory and free-living experiments.
Nakagata T; Murakami H; Kawakami R; Tripette J; Nakae S; Yamada Y; Ishikawa-Takata K; Tanaka S; Miyachi M
Gait Posture; 2022 Oct; 98():24-33. PubMed ID: 36030707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of consumer monitors for estimating energy expenditure in youth.
LaMunion SR; Blythe AL; Hibbing PR; Kaplan AS; Clendenin BJ; Crouter SE
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2020 Feb; 45(2):161-168. PubMed ID: 31269409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of physical activity from Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers worn on the dominant and non-dominant wrist.
Buchan DS; McSeveney F; McLellan G
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2019 Jan; 39(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 30058765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Calibration of wrist-worn ActiWatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X for assessment of physical activity in young adults.
Lee P; Tse CY
Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():141-149. PubMed ID: 30476691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of free-living physical activity measurements between ActiGraph GT3X-BT and Fitbit Charge 3 in young people with haemophilia.
Matlary RED; Holme PA; Glosli H; Rueegg CS; Grydeland M
Haemophilia; 2022 Nov; 28(6):e172-e180. PubMed ID: 35830613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reliability and validity of two fitness tracker devices in the laboratory and home environment for older community-dwelling people.
Burton E; Hill KD; Lautenschlager NT; Thøgersen-Ntoumani C; Lewin G; Boyle E; Howie E
BMC Geriatr; 2018 May; 18(1):103. PubMed ID: 29724191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparability and feasibility of wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers in free-living adolescents.
Scott JJ; Rowlands AV; Cliff DP; Morgan PJ; Plotnikoff RC; Lubans DR
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28501418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validity of Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers for Estimating VO
Passler S; Bohrer J; Blöchinger L; Senner V
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(17):. PubMed ID: 31443347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
