These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36157569)

  • 1. Variable inclusion strategies through directed acyclic graphs to adjust health surveys subject to selection bias for producing national estimates.
    Li Y; Irimata KE; He Y; Parker J
    J Off Stat; 2022 Sep; 38(3):875-900. PubMed ID: 36157569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of whether propensity score adjustment can remove the self-selection bias inherent to web panel surveys addressing sensitive health behaviours.
    Copas A; Burkill S; Conrad F; Couper MP; Erens B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):251. PubMed ID: 33032535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calibration Weighting Methods for the National Center for Health Statistics Research and Development Survey.
    Irimata KE; He Y; Parsons VL; Shin HC; Zhang G
    Vital Health Stat 2; 2023 Mar; (199):1-23. PubMed ID: 36940133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonprobability Web surveys to measure sexual behaviors and attitudes in the general population: a comparison with a probability sample interview survey.
    Erens B; Burkill S; Couper MP; Conrad F; Clifton S; Tanton C; Phelps A; Datta J; Mercer CH; Sonnenberg P; Prah P; Mitchell KR; Wellings K; Johnson AM; Copas AJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Dec; 16(12):e276. PubMed ID: 25488851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining directed acyclic graphs and the change-in-estimate procedure as a novel approach to adjustment-variable selection in epidemiology.
    Evans D; Chaix B; Lobbedez T; Verger C; Flahault A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Oct; 12():156. PubMed ID: 23058038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adjusted logistic propensity weighting methods for population inference using nonprobability volunteer-based epidemiologic cohorts.
    Wang L; Valliant R; Li Y
    Stat Med; 2021 Oct; 40(24):5237-5250. PubMed ID: 34219260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On modelling response propensity for dwelling unit (DU) level non-response adjustment in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).
    Wun LM; Ezzati-Rice TM; Diaz-Tena N; Greenblatt J
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(8):1875-84. PubMed ID: 17206601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of sampling and data collection methods on maternity survey response: a randomised controlled trial of paper and push-to-web surveys and a concurrent social media survey.
    Harrison S; Alderdice F; Quigley MA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):10. PubMed ID: 36635637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Graphical Models for Quasi-experimental Designs.
    Steiner PM; Kim Y; Hall CE; Su D
    Sociol Methods Res; 2017 Mar; 46(2):155-188. PubMed ID: 30174355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On variance estimate for covariate adjustment by propensity score analysis.
    Zou B; Zou F; Shuster JJ; Tighe PJ; Koch GG; Zhou H
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3537-48. PubMed ID: 26999553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to identify confounders in applied health research: review and recommendations.
    Tennant PWG; Murray EJ; Arnold KF; Berrie L; Fox MP; Gadd SC; Harrison WJ; Keeble C; Ranker LR; Textor J; Tomova GD; Gilthorpe MS; Ellison GTH
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 May; 50(2):620-632. PubMed ID: 33330936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Software Application Profile: The daggle app-a tool to support learning and teaching the graphical rules of selecting adjustment variables using directed acyclic graphs.
    Hanly M; Brew BK; Austin A; Jorm L
    Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 52(5):1659-1664. PubMed ID: 36952629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Research and Development Survey (RANDS) during COVID-19.
    Irimata KE; Scanlon PJ
    Stat J IAOS; 2022 Mar; 38(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 35928170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhancing estimation methods for integrating probability and nonprobability survey samples with machine-learning techniques. An application to a Survey on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain.
    Rueda MDM; Pasadas-Del-Amo S; Rodríguez BC; Castro-Martín L; Ferri-García R
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2200035. PubMed ID: 36136044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Propensity score adjustment using machine learning classification algorithms to control selection bias in online surveys.
    Ferri-García R; Rueda MDM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231500. PubMed ID: 32320429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Directed acyclic graphs: An under-utilized tool for child maltreatment research.
    Austin AE; Desrosiers TA; Shanahan ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 2019 May; 91():78-87. PubMed ID: 30836237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.