324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36160745)
1. Poorly cohesive cells gastric carcinoma including signet-ring cell cancer: Updated review of definition, classification and therapeutic management.
Drubay V; Nuytens F; Renaud F; Adenis A; Eveno C; Piessen G
World J Gastrointest Oncol; 2022 Aug; 14(8):1406-1428. PubMed ID: 36160745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histological and mutational profile of diffuse gastric cancer: current knowledge and future challenges.
Garcia-Pelaez J; Barbosa-Matos R; Gullo I; Carneiro F; Oliveira C
Mol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 15(11):2841-2867. PubMed ID: 33724653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of poorly cohesive cell subtype of gastric cancer.
Nakamura K; Eto K; Iwagami S; Ogawa K; Sawayama H; Ishimoto T; Iwatsuki M; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Yoshida N; Baba H
Int J Clin Oncol; 2022 Mar; 27(3):512-519. PubMed ID: 35084597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consensus on the pathological definition and classification of poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma.
Mariette C; Carneiro F; Grabsch HI; van der Post RS; Allum W; de Manzoni G;
Gastric Cancer; 2019 Jan; 22(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 30167905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic review of risk factors, prognosis, and management of colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma.
Nuytens F; Drubay V; Eveno C; Renaud F; Piessen G
World J Gastrointest Oncol; 2024 May; 16(5):2141-2158. PubMed ID: 38764832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gastric poorly cohesive carcinoma: a correlative study of mutational signatures and prognostic significance based on histopathological subtypes.
Kwon CH; Kim YK; Lee S; Kim A; Park HJ; Choi Y; Won YJ; Park DY; Lauwers GY
Histopathology; 2018 Mar; 72(4):556-568. PubMed ID: 28873240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma. Validity of using the term; translation variants].
Karnaukhov NS; Khomeriki SG; Derizhanova IS; Mantsov AA; Izrailov RE; Tsvirkun VV; Khatkov IE
Arkh Patol; 2021; 83(4):69-72. PubMed ID: 34278764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. State of the art for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: from classification, prognosis, and genomic characteristics to specified treatments.
Machlowska J; Pucułek M; Sitarz M; Terlecki P; Maciejewski R; Sitarz R
Cancer Manag Res; 2019; 11():2151-2161. PubMed ID: 30936747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frozen section diagnosis of gastrointestinal poorly cohesive and signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma: useful morphologic features to avoid misdiagnosis.
Zhu X; Bledsoe JR
Virchows Arch; 2020 Oct; 477(4):497-506. PubMed ID: 32215719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach: Impact on prognosis and specific therapeutic challenge.
Pernot S; Voron T; Perkins G; Lagorce-Pages C; Berger A; Taieb J
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 21(40):11428-38. PubMed ID: 26523107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognosis of poorly cohesive gastric cancer after complete cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CYTO-CHIP study).
Bonnot PE; Lintis A; Mercier F; Benzerdjeb N; Passot G; Pocard M; Meunier B; Bereder JM; Abboud K; Marchal F; Quenet F; Goere D; Msika S; Arvieux C; Pirro N; Wernert R; Rat P; Gagnière J; Lefevre JH; Courvoisier T; Kianmanesh R; Vaudoyer D; Rivoire M; Meeus P; Villeneuve L; Piessen G; Glehen O;
Br J Surg; 2021 Oct; 108(10):1225-1235. PubMed ID: 34498666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histologic purity of signet ring cell carcinoma is a favorable risk factor for lymph node metastasis in poorly cohesive, submucosa-invasive early gastric carcinoma.
Kim YH; Park JH; Park CK; Kim JH; Lee SK; Lee YC; Noh SH; Kim H
Gastric Cancer; 2017 Jul; 20(4):583-590. PubMed ID: 27663439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic significance of poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma in Tunisian patients.
Jouini R; Khanchel F; Sabbah M; Helal I; Gharsallah A; Ferchichi M; Hadded D; Zaafouri H; Ben Brahim E; Ben Maamer A; Debbiche AC
Heliyon; 2020 Mar; 6(3):e03460. PubMed ID: 32195384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of Poorly Cohesive and Signet Ring Cell Carcinomas and Identification of PTPRM as a Diagnostic Marker.
Bae GE; Kang SH; Kim JS; Kim SH; Kim KH; Kim JM; Suh KS; Park HK; Kang DW; Lee H; Yeo MK
Cancers (Basel); 2022 May; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 35626106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The updated WHO classification of digestive system tumours-gastric adenocarcinoma and dysplasia.
Kushima R
Pathologe; 2022 Feb; 43(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 34807275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Signet ring cell percentage in poorly cohesive gastric cancer patients: A potential novel predictor of survival.
Roviello F; Marano L; Ambrosio MR; Resca L; D'Ignazio A; Petrelli F; Petrioli R; Costantini M; Polom K; Macchiarelli R; Biviano I; Marrelli D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 48(3):561-569. PubMed ID: 34511269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tailored treatment for signet ring cell gastric cancer.
Mengardo V; Treppiedi E; Bencivenga M; Dal Cero M; Giacopuzzi S
Updates Surg; 2018 Jun; 70(2):167-171. PubMed ID: 29948660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: Current Management and Future Challenges.
Li Y; Zhu Z; Ma F; Xue L; Tian Y
Cancer Manag Res; 2020; 12():7973-7981. PubMed ID: 32943931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The significance of a nineteenth century definition in the era of genomics: linitis plastica.
Agnes A; Estrella JS; Badgwell B
World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 15(1):123. PubMed ID: 28679451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Review of management and treatment of peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer origin.
Manzanedo I; Pereira F; Serrano Á; Pérez-Viejo E
J Gastrointest Oncol; 2021 Apr; 12(Suppl 1):S20-S29. PubMed ID: 33968423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
