209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36162577)
21. Polarized potential and electrode materials implication on electro-fermentative di-hydrogen production: Microbial assemblages and hydrogenase gene copy variation.
Arunasri K; Annie Modestra J; Yeruva DK; Vamshi Krishna K; Venkata Mohan S
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Jan; 200():691-8. PubMed ID: 26556403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Scaling-up of membraneless microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) for domestic wastewater treatment: Bottlenecks and limitations.
Escapa A; San-Martín MI; Mateos R; Morán A
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Mar; 180():72-8. PubMed ID: 25590425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of low-cost cathode catalysts for high yield biohydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cell.
Wang L; Chen Y; Ye Y; Lu B; Zhu S; Shen S
Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 21278465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. H
Rivera I; Bakonyi P; Buitrón G
Chemosphere; 2017 Mar; 171():379-385. PubMed ID: 28033568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Enhanced performance of sulfate reducing bacteria based biocathode using stainless steel mesh on activated carbon fabric electrode.
Sharma M; Jain P; Varanasi JL; Lal B; Rodríguez J; Lema JM; Sarma PM
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Dec; 150():172-80. PubMed ID: 24161648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evidence of competition between electrogens shaping electroactive microbial communities in microbial electrolysis cells.
Abadikhah M; Rodriguez MC; Persson F; Wilén BM; Farewell A; Modin O
Front Microbiol; 2022; 13():959211. PubMed ID: 36590422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Vapor-Fed Cathode Microbial Electrolysis Cells with Closely Spaced Electrodes Enables Greatly Improved Performance.
Rossi R; Baek G; Logan BE
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jan; 56(2):1211-1220. PubMed ID: 34971515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Nickel ion removal from wastewater using the microbial electrolysis cell.
Qin B; Luo H; Liu G; Zhang R; Chen S; Hou Y; Luo Y
Bioresour Technol; 2012 Oct; 121():458-61. PubMed ID: 22850172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Electrocoagulation of a real reactive dyebath effluent using aluminum and stainless steel electrodes.
Arslan-Alaton I; Kabdaşli I; Hanbaba D; Kuybu E
J Hazard Mater; 2008 Jan; 150(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 17945416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Stainless steel mesh supported nitrogen-doped carbon nanofibers for binder-free cathode in microbial fuel cells.
Chen S; Chen Y; He G; He S; Schröder U; Hou H
Biosens Bioelectron; 2012 Apr; 34(1):282-5. PubMed ID: 22336437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The role of microbial electrolysis cell in urban wastewater treatment: integration options, challenges, and prospects.
Katuri KP; Ali M; Saikaly PE
Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2019 Jun; 57():101-110. PubMed ID: 30953903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of Nanomaterials and Other Factors on Biohydrogen Production Rates in Microbial Electrolysis Cells-A Review.
Abd-Elrahman NK; Al-Harbi N; Al-Hadeethi Y; Alruqi AB; Mohammed H; Umar A; Akbar S
Molecules; 2022 Dec; 27(23):. PubMed ID: 36500687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of anodic potential and chloride ion on overall reactivity in electrochemical reactors designed for solar-powered wastewater treatment.
Cho K; Qu Y; Kwon D; Zhang H; Cid CA; Aryanfar A; Hoffmann MR
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Feb; 48(4):2377-84. PubMed ID: 24417418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of applied potential on treatment performance and clogging behaviour of hybrid constructed wetland-microbial electrochemical technologies.
Srivastava P; Abbassi R; Yadav A; Garaniya V; Asadnia M; Lewis T; Khan SJ
Chemosphere; 2021 Dec; 284():131296. PubMed ID: 34182282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of applied potential on phosphine formation in synthetic wastewater treatment by Microbial Electrolysis Cell (MEC).
Liu W; Niu X; Chen W; An S; Sheng H
Chemosphere; 2017 Apr; 173():172-179. PubMed ID: 28110006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Electrochemical struvite precipitation from digestate with a fluidized bed cathode microbial electrolysis cell.
Cusick RD; Ullery ML; Dempsey BA; Logan BE
Water Res; 2014 May; 54():297-306. PubMed ID: 24583521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Increasing phosphorus recovery from dewatering centrate in microbial electrolysis cells.
Yuan P; Kim Y
Biotechnol Biofuels; 2017; 10():70. PubMed ID: 28331546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Overcoming hydrogen loss in single-chamber microbial electrolysis cells by urine amendment.
Wang B; Liu Y; Wang X; Sun P
Water Res; 2023 Dec; 247():120755. PubMed ID: 37918197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Hydrogen production from continuous flow, microbial reverse-electrodialysis electrolysis cells treating fermentation wastewater.
Watson VJ; Hatzell M; Logan BE
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Nov; 195():51-6. PubMed ID: 26051523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Onset Investigation on Dynamic Change of Biohythane Generation and Microbial Structure in Dual-chamber versus Single-chamber Microbial Electrolysis Cells.
Luo S; Liu F; Fu B; He K; Yang H; Zhang X; Liang P; Huang X
Water Res; 2021 Aug; 201():117326. PubMed ID: 34147740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
