These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36162979)

  • 21. Technical note: Impact of pedigree depth on convergence of single-step genomic BLUP in a purebred swine population.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco DAL; Bradford HL; Chen CY; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3391-3395. PubMed ID: 28805917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of breeding values in small genotyped populations using different sources of external information-A simulation study.
    Andonov S; Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Masuda Y; Pocrnic I; Tsuruta S; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):395-401. PubMed ID: 28341049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incorporation of causative quantitative trait nucleotides in single-step GBLUP.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jul; 49(1):59. PubMed ID: 28747171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Short communication: Genomic prediction using different single-step methods in the Finnish red dairy cattle population.
    Gao H; Koivula M; Jensen J; Strandén I; Madsen P; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Nov; 101(11):10082-10088. PubMed ID: 30146284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. SNP- and haplotype-based single-step genomic predictions for body weight, wool, and reproductive traits in North American Rambouillet sheep.
    Araujo AC; Carneiro PLS; Oliveira HR; Lewis RM; Brito LF
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 Mar; 140(2):216-234. PubMed ID: 36408677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficient single-step genomic evaluation for a multibreed beef cattle population having many genotyped animals.
    Mäntysaari EA; Evans RD; Strandén I
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Nov; 95(11):4728-4737. PubMed ID: 29293736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle.
    Naserkheil M; Lee DH; Mehrban H
    BMC Genet; 2020 Dec; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33267771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
    Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multibreed genomic evaluation for production traits of dairy cattle in the United States using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
    Cesarani A; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5141-5152. PubMed ID: 35282922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
    Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AC; Verbyla K; Goddard ME
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Nov; 41(1):51. PubMed ID: 19930712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Technical note: Automatic scaling in single-step genomic BLUP.
    Bermann M; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Feb; 104(2):2027-2031. PubMed ID: 33309381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
    Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models.
    Strandén I; Matilainen K; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):264-274. PubMed ID: 28508482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An efficient exact method to obtain GBLUP and single-step GBLUP when the genomic relationship matrix is singular.
    Fernando RL; Cheng H; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):80. PubMed ID: 27788669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of genomic recursions and algorithm for proven and young animals for single-step genomic BLUP analyses--a simulation study.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Misztal I
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 25857518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implication of the order of blending and tuning when computing the genomic relationship matrix in single-step GBLUP.
    McWhorter TM; Bermann M; Garcia ALS; Legarra A; Aguilar I; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 Jan; 140(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 35946919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Dimensionality of Genomic Information and Its Effect on Genomic Prediction.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco DA; Masuda Y; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genetics; 2016 May; 203(1):573-81. PubMed ID: 26944916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.