These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36162979)

  • 41. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Breeding value reliabilities for multiple-trait single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
    Ben Zaabza H; Taskinen M; Mäntysaari EA; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Strandén I
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5221-5237. PubMed ID: 35400498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Weighted single-step genomic BLUP improves accuracy of genomic breeding values for protein content in French dairy goats: a quantitative trait influenced by a major gene.
    Teissier M; Larroque H; Robert-Granié C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jun; 50(1):31. PubMed ID: 29907084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. On the equivalence between marker effect models and breeding value models and direct genomic values with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.
    Bermann M; Lourenco D; Forneris NS; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Jul; 54(1):52. PubMed ID: 35842585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.
    Cesarani A; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5843-5853. PubMed ID: 33663836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Impact and utility of shallow pedigree using single-step genomic BLUP for prediction of unbiased genomic breeding values.
    Gowane GR; Alex R; Mukherjee A; Vohra V
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2022 Oct; 54(6):339. PubMed ID: 36210357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of iterated single-step and Bayesian regressions on genomic evaluations for age at 100 kg in swine.
    Freitas MS; Freitas LS; Weber T; Yamaki M; Cantão ME; Peixoto JO; Ledur MC
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4675-83. PubMed ID: 26523560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Extension of the reduced animal model to single-step methods.
    Nilforooshan MA
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36069946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
    Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Genomic prediction of milk-production traits and somatic cell score using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor with random regression test-day model in Thai dairy cattle.
    Buaban S; Prempree S; Sumreddee P; Duangjinda M; Masuda Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Dec; 104(12):12713-12723. PubMed ID: 34538484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of selection and selective genotyping for creation of reference on bias and accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Gowane GR; Lee SH; Clark S; Moghaddar N; Al-Mamun HA; van der Werf JHJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Sep; 136(5):390-407. PubMed ID: 31215699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Genomic evaluation of Brown Swiss dairy cattle with limited national genotype data and integrated external information.
    Luštrek B; Vandenplas J; Gorjanc G; Potočnik K
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5738-5754. PubMed ID: 33685705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
    Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Crossbreed evaluations in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor using adjusted realized relationship matrices.
    Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Fragomeni BO; Chen CY; Herring WO; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):909-19. PubMed ID: 27065253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Boundaries for genotype, phenotype, and pedigree truncation in genomic evaluations in pigs.
    Bussiman F; Chen CY; Holl J; Bermann M; Legarra A; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37584978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Lawlor TJ; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):4090-4. PubMed ID: 25864050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Genomic predictions based on animal models using genotype imputation on a national scale in Norwegian Red cattle.
    Meuwissen TH; Svendsen M; Solberg T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Oct; 47():79. PubMed ID: 26464226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.