These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36163219)

  • 1. Speech intelligibility prediction based on modulation frequency-selective processing.
    Relaño-Iborra H; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108610. PubMed ID: 36163219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multi-resolution envelope-power based model for speech intelligibility.
    Jørgensen S; Ewert SD; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):436-46. PubMed ID: 23862819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modelling speech intelligibility in adverse conditions.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():343-51. PubMed ID: 23716240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Envelope and intensity based prediction of psychoacoustic masking and speech intelligibility.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1023. PubMed ID: 27586734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of short-time intensity and envelope power for speech intelligibility and psychoacoustic masking.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1098. PubMed ID: 28863616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting binaural speech intelligibility using the signal-to-noise ratio in the envelope power spectrum domain.
    Chabot-Leclerc A; MacDonald EN; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):192. PubMed ID: 27475146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling the effects of a single reflection on binaural speech intelligibility.
    Rennies J; Warzybok A; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1556-67. PubMed ID: 24606290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting speech intelligibility based on a correlation metric in the envelope power spectrum domain.
    Relaño-Iborra H; May T; Zaar J; Scheidiger C; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2670. PubMed ID: 27794330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of an extended equalization-cancellation model to speech intelligibility with spatially distributed maskers.
    Wan R; Durlach NI; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3678-90. PubMed ID: 21218900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of the influence of reverberation on binaural speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet.
    Rennies J; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 22087928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of manipulating the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio on speech intelligibility.
    Jørgensen S; Decorsière R; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1401-10. PubMed ID: 25786952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A dynamic binaural harmonic-cancellation model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker varying in intonation, temporal envelope, and location.
    Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108535. PubMed ID: 35654633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Further validation of a binaural model predicting speech intelligibility against envelope-modulated noises.
    Vicente T; Lavandier M
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107937. PubMed ID: 32192940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binaural prediction of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms with multiple noise sources.
    Lavandier M; Jelfs S; Culling JF; Watkins AJ; Raimond AP; Makin SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):218-31. PubMed ID: 22280586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Signal envelope and speech intelligibility differentially impact auditory motion perception.
    Warnecke M; Litovsky RY
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):15117. PubMed ID: 34302032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
    Collin B; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modelling binaural unmasking and the intelligibility of speech in noise and reverberation for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Vicente T; Buchholz JM; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3275. PubMed ID: 34852607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A model that predicts the binaural advantage to speech intelligibility from the mixed target and interferer signals.
    Cosentino S; Marquardt T; McAlpine D; Culling JF; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):796-807. PubMed ID: 25234888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.