BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36163228)

  • 1. Tunnel collapse risk assessment based on improved quantitative theory III and EW-AHP coupling weight.
    Li L; Ni B; Zhang S; Qiang Y; Zhang Z; Zhou L; Liu G; Cheng L
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):16054. PubMed ID: 36163228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flood risk assessment of Wuhan, China, using a multi-criteria analysis model with the improved AHP-Entropy method.
    Chen Y; Wang D; Zhang L; Guo H; Ma J; Gao W
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Sep; 30(42):96001-96018. PubMed ID: 37561303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation with AHP and entropy methods and health risk assessment of groundwater in Yinchuan Basin, northwest China.
    Zhong C; Yang Q; Liang J; Ma H
    Environ Res; 2022 Mar; 204(Pt A):111956. PubMed ID: 34454937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk grade assessment of sudden water pollution based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.
    Zhang H; Li W; Miao P; Sun B; Kong F
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(1):469-481. PubMed ID: 31797271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Novel Method in Surface Water Quality Assessment Based on Improved Variable Fuzzy Set Pair Analysis.
    Liu Y; Wang C; Chun Y; Yang L; Chen W; Ding J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Nov; 16(22):. PubMed ID: 31698768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A coupling methodology of the analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight theory for assessing coastal water quality.
    Xiao K; Tamborski J; Wang X; Feng X; Wang S; Wang Q; Lin D; Li H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(21):31217-31234. PubMed ID: 35001278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic risk evaluation method for collapse disasters of drill-and-blast tunnels: a case study.
    Wu B; Qiu W; Huang W; Meng G; Huang J; Xu S
    Math Biosci Eng; 2022 Jan; 19(1):309-330. PubMed ID: 34902993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic assessment of water quality based on a variable fuzzy pattern recognition model.
    Xu S; Wang T; Hu S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Feb; 12(2):2230-48. PubMed ID: 25689998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of risk factors in forest road design and construction activities with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in Turkey.
    Akay AO; Demir M; Akgul M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Aug; 190(9):561. PubMed ID: 30167894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An approach for environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and fuzzy inference rules.
    Topuz E; van Gestel CA
    Environ Int; 2016; 92-93():334-47. PubMed ID: 27131016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic risk evaluation method of collapse in the whole construction of shallow buried tunnels and engineering application.
    Li Z; Wang S; Cao Y; Ding R
    Math Biosci Eng; 2022 Feb; 19(4):4300-4319. PubMed ID: 35341299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing coastal reclamation suitability based on a fuzzy-AHP comprehensive evaluation framework: A case study of Lianyungang, China.
    Feng L; Zhu X; Sun X
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2014 Dec; 89(1-2):102-111. PubMed ID: 25455377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based risk priority number for risk assessments of commissioning process of a ring gantry LINAC.
    Chang J; Jang S; Lalonde R; Huq SM
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Nov; 23(11):e13760. PubMed ID: 35998202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AHP-FSE-Based Risk Assessment and Mitigation for Slurry Balancing Shield Tunnel Construction.
    Li K; Xiahou X; Huang H; Tang L; Huang J; Li Q; Feng P
    J Environ Public Health; 2022; 2022():1666950. PubMed ID: 35733980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk assessment of supply chain for pharmaceutical excipients with AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.
    Li M; Du Y; Wang Q; Sun C; Ling X; Yu B; Tu J; Xiong Y
    Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2016 Apr; 42(4):676-684. PubMed ID: 26266963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Integrated MCDM Model for Conveyor Equipment Evaluation and Selection in an FMC Based on a Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy ARAS in the Presence of Vagueness.
    Nguyen HT; Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Rifai AP; Aoyama H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153222. PubMed ID: 27070543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comprehensive evaluation of voltage stability based on EW-AHP and Fuzzy-TOPSIS.
    Wu J; Wang H; Yao L; Kang Z; Zhang Q
    Heliyon; 2019 Oct; 5(10):e02410. PubMed ID: 31667370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating water-yield property of karst aquifer based on the AHP and CV.
    Yu S; Ding H; Zeng Y
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):3308. PubMed ID: 35228591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards a Fuzzy Bayesian Network Based Approach for Safety Risk Analysis of Tunnel-Induced Pipeline Damage.
    Zhang L; Wu X; Qin Y; Skibniewski MJ; Liu W
    Risk Anal; 2016 Feb; 36(2):278-301. PubMed ID: 26224125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Specific vulnerability assessment of nitrate in shallow groundwater with an improved DRSTIC-LE model.
    Liang J; Li Z; Yang Q; Lei X; Kang A; Li S
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Jun; 174():649-657. PubMed ID: 30875558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.