These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3616429)

  • 1. [Image quality parameters of film-screen systems].
    Hoeschen D
    Rontgenblatter; 1987 Jun; 40(6):193-9. PubMed ID: 3616429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Wiener spectra of roentgen film-screen combinations].
    Mirandé W; Hoeschen D
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Mar; 38(3):81-4. PubMed ID: 3992138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Characteristics of screen-film systems for mammography in relation to a diverse modality of treatment].
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Milano F; Giani M; Bravetti P
    Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 3375482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Measurement of objective parameters of image quality of film-screen combinations].
    Angerstein W; Wolf M
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1986; 27(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 3961142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographic mottle: a comprehensive theory.
    Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(5):656-67. PubMed ID: 7155067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The parameters of image quality of a novel ultra high resolution film-screen system].
    Beutel J; Mickewich DJ; Issler SL; Shaw R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Jan; 4(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 8136386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Basic parameters and testing methods for medical roentgen screens].
    Gurvich AM; Il'ina MA; Katomina RV
    Med Tekh; 1987; (6):38-44. PubMed ID: 3326993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Sharpness of detail and density in film-screen systems].
    Maurer HJ; Goos F
    Rontgenblatter; 1986 Sep; 39(9):260-3. PubMed ID: 3775203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
    Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The application of image quality measurements for digital angiography.
    Peterzol A; Padovani R; Quai E; Vano E; Prieto C; Aviles P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16461533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The physical aspects of traditional radiology and of computed radiology compared].
    Bacarini L; Giacomich R; Saccavini C
    Radiol Med; 1995 Apr; 89(4):506-19. PubMed ID: 7597234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Modification of the quality of the roentgen image by screen and film--experimental studies].
    Maurer HJ; Goos F
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Feb; 38(2):54-7. PubMed ID: 3983537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systems.
    Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 3974523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A model for image formation and image quality prediction in diagnostic radiology.
    Kandarakis I; Cavouras D; Koutsourakis C; Triantis D; Bakas A; Panayiotakis G; Nomicos C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt B():517-21. PubMed ID: 10179719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A gamma-ray sensitometer for film-screen combinations in diagnostic radiology].
    Nowotny R; Bliem J
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Apr; 38(4):117-20. PubMed ID: 4001775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selecting the best screen-film combination.
    Stears JG; Gray JE; Frank ED
    Radiol Technol; 1987; 58(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 3823415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Analysis of frequency-contrast characteristics of digital X-ray image detectors].
    Zelikman MI; Kabanov SP; Kokuev AN; Kruchinin SA; Lobov DP
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):23-7. PubMed ID: 17133940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The effect of technical parameters on diagnostic quality].
    Brandt GA
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 2018801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.