These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36164764)

  • 21. Digital contrast sensitivity chart with varying visual acuity: Development and validation.
    Hegde PG; Rao D; Prudhvi B; Hegde N
    Oman J Ophthalmol; 2023; 16(3):467-471. PubMed ID: 38059109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reliability of Mesopic Measures of Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity and Their Correlation with Rod and Cone Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa.
    Bittner AK; Ferraz MC
    Ophthalmic Res; 2020; 63(2):133-140. PubMed ID: 31805550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Normal values for the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test.
    Mäntyjärvi M; Laitinen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2001 Feb; 27(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 11226793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Design and validation of a chart-based measure of the limits of spatial contrast sensitivity.
    Adhikari P; Carter DD; Feigl B; Zele AJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Jan; 42(1):110-122. PubMed ID: 34755353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Grating acuity and contrast tests for clinical trials of severe vision loss.
    Bittner AK; Jeter P; Dagnelie G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Oct; 88(10):1153-63. PubMed ID: 21747309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improving the design of the letter contrast sensitivity test.
    Arditi A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(6):2225-9. PubMed ID: 15914645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Assessment of mesopic and contrast vision for driving licences: which cut-off values, which methods are appropriate?].
    Wilhelm H; Peters T; Durst W; Roelcke S; Quast R; Hütten M; Wilhelm B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2013 Nov; 230(11):1106-13. PubMed ID: 24190829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Repeatability and Discriminatory Power of Chart-Based Visual Function Tests in Individuals With Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A MACUSTAR Study Report.
    Dunbar HMP; Behning C; Abdirahman A; Higgins BE; Binns AM; Terheyden JH; Zakaria N; Poor S; Finger RP; Leal S; Holz FG; Schmid M; Crabb DP; Rubin GS; Luhmann UFO;
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 140(8):780-789. PubMed ID: 35737401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Remote Monitoring of Visual Function in Patients with Maculopathy: The Aphelion Study.
    Joseph A; Bullimore M; Drawnel F; Miranda M; Morgan Z; Wang YZ
    Ophthalmol Ther; 2024 Jan; 13(1):409-422. PubMed ID: 38015309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Distance and near visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and visual fields of 10-year-old children.
    Myers VS; Gidlewski N; Quinn GE; Miller D; Dobson V
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1999 Jan; 117(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9930166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D; Bonette L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Oct; 10(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2263364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. EVALUATING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION USING A NOVEL COMPUTER-BASED TEST, THE SPAETH/RICHMAN CONTRAST SENSITIVITY TEST.
    Faria BM; Duman F; Zheng CX; Waisbourd M; Gupta L; Ali M; Zangalli C; Lu L; Wizov SS; Spaeth E; Richman J; Spaeth GL
    Retina; 2015 Jul; 35(7):1465-73. PubMed ID: 25658175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity.
    Simpson TL; Regan D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jan; 72(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7731649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. SPARCS and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity testing in normal controls and patients with cataract.
    Gupta L; Cvintal V; Delvadia R; Sun Y; Erdem E; Zangalli C; Lu L; Wizov SS; Richman J; Spaeth E; Spaeth GL
    Eye (Lond); 2017 May; 31(5):753-761. PubMed ID: 28106888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contrast letter acuity as a visual component for the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite.
    Balcer LJ; Baier ML; Cohen JA; Kooijmans MF; Sandrock AW; Nano-Schiavi ML; Pfohl DC; Mills M; Bowen J; Ford C; Heidenreich FR; Jacobs DA; Markowitz CE; Stuart WH; Ying GS; Galetta SL; Maguire MG; Cutter GR
    Neurology; 2003 Nov; 61(10):1367-73. PubMed ID: 14638957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability of visual performance measurement under optical degradation.
    Woods RL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1993 Apr; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 8265148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in Zaire.
    Kaimbo Wa Kaimbo D; Spileers W; Missotten L
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1996; 263():87-90. PubMed ID: 9396193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of visual function following neodymium:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy.
    Magno BV; Datiles MB; Lasa MS; Fajardo MR; Caruso RC; Kaiser-Kupfer MI
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Aug; 104(8):1287-93. PubMed ID: 9261315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contrast sensitivity and glare in cataract using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Williamson TH; Strong NP; Sparrow J; Aggarwal RK; Harrad R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1992 Dec; 76(12):719-22. PubMed ID: 1486072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The SPARCS: a novel assessment of contrast sensitivity and its reliability in patients with corrected refractive error.
    Sun Y; Erdem E; Lyu A; Zangalli C; Wizov SS; Lo D; Spaeth EE; Richman J; Spaeth GL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 100(10):1421-6. PubMed ID: 26758536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.