BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36166314)

  • 1. Improving Peptide-Level Mass Spectrometry Analysis via Double Competition.
    Lin A; Short T; Noble WS; Keich U
    J Proteome Res; 2022 Oct; 21(10):2412-2420. PubMed ID: 36166314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Challenging Targets or Describing Mismatches? A Comment on Common Decoy Distribution by Madej et al.
    Etourneau L; Burger T
    J Proteome Res; 2022 Dec; 21(12):2840-2845. PubMed ID: 36305797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-dimensional target decoy strategy for shotgun proteomics.
    Bern MW; Kil YJ
    J Proteome Res; 2011 Dec; 10(12):5296-301. PubMed ID: 22010998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved False Discovery Rate Estimation Procedure for Shotgun Proteomics.
    Keich U; Kertesz-Farkas A; Noble WS
    J Proteome Res; 2015 Aug; 14(8):3148-61. PubMed ID: 26152888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. False discovery rate estimation using candidate peptides for each spectrum.
    Lee S; Park H; Kim H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):454. PubMed ID: 36319948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Common Decoy Distributions Simplify False Discovery Rate Estimation in Shotgun Proteomics.
    Madej D; Wu L; Lam H
    J Proteome Res; 2022 Feb; 21(2):339-348. PubMed ID: 34989576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Target-decoy false discovery rate estimation using Crema.
    Lin A; See D; Fondrie WE; Keich U; Noble WS
    Proteomics; 2024 Apr; 24(8):e2300084. PubMed ID: 38380501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling Lower-Order Statistics to Enable Decoy-Free FDR Estimation in Proteomics.
    Madej D; Lam H
    J Proteome Res; 2023 Apr; 22(4):1159-1171. PubMed ID: 36962508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decoy methods for assessing false positives and false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics.
    Wang G; Wu WW; Zhang Z; Masilamani S; Shen RF
    Anal Chem; 2009 Jan; 81(1):146-59. PubMed ID: 19061407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Challenges in Peptide-Spectrum Matching: A Robust and Reproducible Statistical Framework for Removing Low-Accuracy, High-Scoring Hits.
    Hubler SL; Kumar P; Mehta S; Easterly C; Johnson JE; Jagtap PD; Griffin TJ
    J Proteome Res; 2020 Jan; 19(1):161-173. PubMed ID: 31793300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Large Scale Mass Spectrometry-based Identifications of Enzyme-mediated Protein Methylation Are Subject to High False Discovery Rates.
    Hart-Smith G; Yagoub D; Tay AP; Pickford R; Wilkins MR
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2016 Mar; 15(3):989-1006. PubMed ID: 26699799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reinvestigating the Correctness of Decoy-Based False Discovery Rate Control in Proteomics Tandem Mass Spectrometry.
    Freestone J; Noble WS; Keich U
    J Proteome Res; 2024 Jun; 23(6):1907-1914. PubMed ID: 38687997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New mixture models for decoy-free false discovery rate estimation in mass spectrometry proteomics.
    Peng Y; Jain S; Li YF; Greguš M; Ivanov AR; Vitek O; Radivojac P
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Dec; 36(Suppl_2):i745-i753. PubMed ID: 33381824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Group-walk: a rigorous approach to group-wise false discovery rate analysis by target-decoy competition.
    Freestone J; Short T; Noble WS; Keich U
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 38(Suppl_2):ii82-ii88. PubMed ID: 36124786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality Control for the Target Decoy Approach for Peptide Identification.
    Debrie E; Malfait M; Gabriels R; Declerq A; Sticker A; Martens L; Clement L
    J Proteome Res; 2023 Feb; 22(2):350-358. PubMed ID: 36648107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical multidimensional space for scoring peptide spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics.
    Ivanov MV; Levitsky LI; Lobas AA; Panic T; Laskay ÜA; Mitulovic G; Schmid R; Pridatchenko ML; Tsybin YO; Gorshkov MV
    J Proteome Res; 2014 Apr; 13(4):1911-20. PubMed ID: 24571493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving X!Tandem on peptide identification from mass spectrometry by self-boosted Percolator.
    Yang P; Ma J; Wang P; Zhu Y; Zhou BB; Yang YH
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(5):1273-80. PubMed ID: 22689082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MUMAL2: Improving sensitivity in shotgun proteomics using cost sensitive artificial neural networks and a threshold selector algorithm.
    Cerqueira FR; Ricardo AM; de Paiva Oliveira A; Graber A; Baumgartner C
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 18):472. PubMed ID: 28105913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bridging the False Discovery Gap.
    Ebadi A; Freestone J; Noble WS; Keich U
    J Proteome Res; 2023 Jul; 22(7):2172-2178. PubMed ID: 37261867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An algorithm for decoy-free false discovery rate estimation in XL-MS/MS proteomics.
    Peng Y; Jain S; Radivojac P
    Bioinformatics; 2024 Jun; 40(Supplement_1):i428-i436. PubMed ID: 38940171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.