These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36167068)

  • 61. Effect of fundamental frequency on judgments of electrolaryngeal speech.
    Nagle KF; Eadie TL; Wright DR; Sumida YA
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2012 May; 21(2):154-66. PubMed ID: 22355005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Judgments of Emotion in Clear and Conversational Speech by Young Adults With Normal Hearing and Older Adults With Hearing Impairment.
    Morgan SD; Ferguson SH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 60(8):2271-2280. PubMed ID: 28687824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Contributions of Voice and Nonverbal Communication to Perceived Masculinity-Femininity for Cisgender and Transgender Communicators.
    Hardy TLD; Boliek CA; Aalto D; Lewicke J; Wells K; Rieger JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 63(4):931-947. PubMed ID: 32196397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies affect perceptions of speaker cooperativeness.
    Knowles KK; Little AC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(9):1657-75. PubMed ID: 26360784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Concatenation of the Moving Window Technique for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis of Voice Quality.
    Ehrlich B; Lin L; Jiang J
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Nov; 27(4):1426-1433. PubMed ID: 30304342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. How does familiarity with a voice affect trait judgements?
    Lavan N; Mileva M; McGettigan C
    Br J Psychol; 2021 Feb; 112(1):282-300. PubMed ID: 32445499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Individual differences in voice quality perception.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Precoda K; Berke GS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):512-20. PubMed ID: 1608242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Pre- and posttreatment voice and speech outcomes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy: expert listeners' and patient's perception.
    van der Molen L; van Rossum MA; Jacobi I; van Son RJ; Smeele LE; Rasch CR; Hilgers FJ
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):664.e25-33. PubMed ID: 22209059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Listeners' perceptions of the certainty and honesty of a speaker are associated with a common prosodic signature.
    Goupil L; Ponsot E; Richardson D; Reyes G; Aucouturier JJ
    Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):861. PubMed ID: 33558510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The effect of levels and types of experience on judgment of synthesized voice quality.
    Sofranko JL; Prosek RA
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 24119637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. L2 voice recognition: The role of speaker-, listener-, and stimulus-related factors.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):3058. PubMed ID: 29195438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparison of acoustic and perceptual measures of voice in male-to-female transsexuals perceived as female versus those perceived as male.
    Gelfer MP; Schofield KJ
    J Voice; 2000 Mar; 14(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 10764114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Towards understanding speaker discrimination abilities in humans and machines for text-independent short utterances of different speech styles.
    Park SJ; Yeung G; Vesselinova N; Kreiman J; Keating PA; Alwan A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):375. PubMed ID: 30075658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Gender and speech rate in the perception of competence and social attractiveness.
    Feldstein S; Dohm FA; Crown CL
    J Soc Psychol; 2001 Dec; 141(6):785-806. PubMed ID: 11827225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Discrimination of speaker sex and size when glottal-pulse rate and vocal-tract length are controlled.
    Smith DR; Walters TC; Patterson RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3628-39. PubMed ID: 18247770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Women use voice parameters to assess men's characteristics.
    Bruckert L; Liénard JS; Lacroix A; Kreutzer M; Leboucher G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Jan; 273(1582):83-9. PubMed ID: 16519239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Perceptual analysis of the male-to-female transgender voice after glottoplasty-the telephone test.
    Meister J; Kühn H; Shehata-Dieler W; Hagen R; Kleinsasser N
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Apr; 127(4):875-881. PubMed ID: 27334765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Influence of emotional prosody, content, and repetition on memory recognition of speaker identity.
    Xu H; Armony JL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jul; 74(7):1185-1201. PubMed ID: 33586530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The effects of duration and frequency of occurrence of voiceless fricatives on listeners' perceptions of sound prolongations.
    Kawai N; Healey EC; Carrell TD
    J Commun Disord; 2012; 45(3):161-72. PubMed ID: 22436827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The acoustic correlates of perceived masculinity, perceived femininity, and perceived sexual orientation.
    Munson B
    Lang Speech; 2007; 50(Pt 1):125-42. PubMed ID: 17518106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.