These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36167774)

  • 1. A decade of declining prostatectomy margin positivity within a prostate cancer clinical quality registry.
    Papa N; Perera M; Bensley JG; Evans M; Millar J; Frydenberg M; Murphy DG; Bolton D
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Dec; 40(12):537.e19-537.e24. PubMed ID: 36167774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positive surgical margins: rate, contributing factors and impact on further treatment: findings from the Prostate Cancer Registry.
    Evans SM; Millar JL; Frydenberg M; Murphy DG; Davis ID; Spelman T; Bolton DM; Giles GG; Dean J; Costello AJ; Frauman AG; Kearns PA; Day L; Daniels C; McNeill JJ
    BJU Int; 2014 Nov; 114(5):680-90. PubMed ID: 24128010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation in Positive Surgical Margin Status After Radical Prostatectomy for pT2 Prostate Cancer.
    Tan WS; Krimphove MJ; Cole AP; Marchese M; Berg S; Lipsitz SR; Löppenberg B; Nabi J; Abdollah F; Choueiri TK; Kibel AS; Sooriakumaran P; Trinh QD
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Oct; 17(5):e1060-e1068. PubMed ID: 31303561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors.
    Liss M; Osann K; Ornstein D
    BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 18435807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
    Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients.
    Sooriakumaran P; Srivastava A; Shariat SF; Stricker PD; Ahlering T; Eden CG; Wiklund PN; Sanchez-Salas R; Mottrie A; Lee D; Neal DE; Ghavamian R; Nyirady P; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Xylinas E; Loidl W; Seitz C; Schramek P; Roehrborn C; Cathelineau X; Skarecky D; Shaw G; Warren A; Delprado WJ; Haynes AM; Steyerberg E; Roobol MJ; Tewari AK
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 24290695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating Incidence, Location, and Predictors of Positive Surgical Margin Among Chinese Men Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Qu W; Yu S; Tao J; Dong B; Fan Y; Du H; Deng H; Liu J; Zhang X
    Cancer Control; 2021; 28():10732748211055265. PubMed ID: 34794321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk of biochemical recurrence and positive surgical margins in patients with pT2 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Røder MA; Thomsen FB; Berg KD; Christensen IB; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
    J Surg Oncol; 2014 Feb; 109(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 24155174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
    Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incidence of positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: Does the surgeon's experience have an influence on all pathological stages?
    Villamil AW; Costabel JI; Billordo Peres N; Martínez PF; Giudice CR; Damia OH
    Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Mar; 38(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 24119633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic radical prostatectomy: analysis of midterm pathologic and oncologic outcomes: A historical series from a high-volume center.
    Asimakopoulos AD; Annino F; Mugnier C; Lopez L; Hoepffner JL; Gaston R; Piechaud T
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Dec; 35(12):6731-6745. PubMed ID: 33289056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Level of invasion into fibromuscular band is an independent factor for positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence in men with organ confined prostate cancer.
    Kim A; Kim M; Jeong SU; Song C; Cho YM; Ro JY; Ahn H
    BMC Urol; 2018 Feb; 18(1):7. PubMed ID: 29394928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.
    Preisser F; Heinze A; S Abrams-Pompe R; Budäus L; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
    Prostate; 2022 Jun; 82(9):949-956. PubMed ID: 35344221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact on oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer of converting soft tissue margins at the apex and bladder neck from tumour-positive to -negative.
    Pak S; Park S; Kim M; Go H; Cho YM; Ahn H
    BJU Int; 2019 May; 123(5):811-817. PubMed ID: 29978558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Does body habitus really make a difference ?
    Albisinni S; Grosman J; Aoun F; Quackels T; Peltier A; Van Velthoven R; Roumeguère T
    Prog Urol; 2018 Jun; 28(8-9):434-441. PubMed ID: 29789234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of the extent and location of positive surgical margins on the risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancers.
    Matti B; Reeves F; Prouse M; Zargar-Shoshtari K
    Prostate; 2021 Dec; 81(16):1428-1434. PubMed ID: 34570379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.