These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36167884)

  • 1. Comparison between X-ray-hysterosalpingography and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography in the assessment of the tubal patency in the cause of female infertility.
    Pace C; Argirò R; Casadei L; Cesareni M; Orlacchio A
    Radiol Med; 2022 Dec; 127(12):1373-1382. PubMed ID: 36167884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in diagnostic work-up of female infertility - comparison with conventional hysterosalpingography: a randomised study.
    Volondat M; Fontas E; Delotte J; Fatfouta I; Chevallier P; Chassang M
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):501-508. PubMed ID: 29974219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fallopian tubal patency diagnosed by magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography.
    Ma L; Wu G; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Wang J; Li L; Zhou W
    J Reprod Med; 2012; 57(9-10):435-40. PubMed ID: 23091993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography and conventional hysterosalpingography: direct visualization of the fallopian tubes using a novel MRI contrast agent mixture.
    Duan N; Chen X; Yin Y; Wang Z; Chen R
    Acta Radiol; 2020 Jul; 61(7):1001-1007. PubMed ID: 31684746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency in infertile women: an observational study.
    De Felice C; Rech F; Marini A; Stagnitti A; Valente F; Cipolla V; Borgogni G; Meggiorini ML
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2012; 39(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 22675963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can hysterosalpingo-foam sonography replace hysterosalpingography as first-choice tubal patency test? A randomized non-inferiority trial.
    van Welie N; van Rijswijk J; Dreyer K; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; van Baal WM; Traas MAF; van Peperstraten AM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; Lambeek AF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Tros R; Lambalk CB; Stoker J; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
    Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(5):969-979. PubMed ID: 35220432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in the diagnostic work-up of female infertility.
    Cipolla V; Guerrieri D; Pietrangeli D; Santucci D; Argirò R; de Felice C
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1132-9. PubMed ID: 26663038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conventional and magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in assessing tubal patency-A comparative study.
    Jagannathan D; Hithaya F
    Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2019; 29(2):163-167. PubMed ID: 31367087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feasibility of dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography for the diagnostic work-up of infertile women.
    Winter L; Glücker T; Steimann S; Fröhlich JM; Steinbrich W; De Geyter C; Pegios W
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):693-701. PubMed ID: 20482222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of time lapse for establishing distal tubal occlusion diagnosis during hysterosalpingography procedure performed by using water soluble contrast media.
    Kahyaoglu S; Yumusak OH; Kahyaoglu I; Kucukbas GN; Esercan A; Tasci Y
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2017 May; 80(5):313-318. PubMed ID: 27889460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography vs. magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography for diagnosing fallopian tubal patency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chen LS; Zhu ZQ; Li J; Wang ZT; Qiang Y; Hu XY; Zhang MM; Wang ZQ
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108891. PubMed ID: 32088657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can hysterolaparoscopic mediated chromopertubation obviate the need for hysterosalpingography for proximal tubal blockage?: An experience at a single tertiary care center.
    Agrawal N; Fayyaz S
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 48(4):241-245. PubMed ID: 29689309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography; a new, low invasive, radiation-free and less painful radiological approach to female infertility.
    Unterweger M; De Geyter C; Fröhlich JM; Bongartz G; Wiesner W
    Hum Reprod; 2002 Dec; 17(12):3138-41. PubMed ID: 12456613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of pelvis multiparametric MRI against CT virtual hysterosalpingography: a prospective study of tubal patency through female infertility assessment.
    Heuser GG; Medeiros TM; Heuser HG; Scopel KRO; Battisti IDE; Hochhegger B; Winkelmann ER
    Br J Radiol; 2023 Jun; 96(1146):20220889. PubMed ID: 37066809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X-ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients.
    Strandell A; Bourne T; Bergh C; Granberg S; Asztely M; Thorburn J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 14(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 10550881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    van Rijswijk J; van Welie N; Dreyer K; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; Kleiman-Broeze KA; Traas MAF; Muijsers GJJM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; van Oostwaard MF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Peters HE; Lier MCI; Lambalk CB; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Stoker J; van der Veen F; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):64. PubMed ID: 29743106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of hysterosalpingograms with laparoscopy in the diagnostic of tubal factor of female infertility at the Yaoundé General Hospital, Cameroon.
    Ngowa JD; Kasia JM; Georges NT; Nkongo V; Sone C; Fongang E
    Pan Afr Med J; 2015; 22():264. PubMed ID: 26958127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparation of magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography and hysterosalpingosonography for the assessment of fallopian tubal occlusion of female infertility: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang J; Zhang X; Bian J; Wang C
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jan; 101(3):e28532. PubMed ID: 35060509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Hysterosonosalpingography and hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal patency in infertility patients].
    de Almeida I; Souza C; Reginatto F; Cunha Filho JS; Facin A; Freitas F; Lavic Y; Passos EP
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2000; 46(4):342-5. PubMed ID: 11175570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography versus hysterosalpingography during fertility work-up: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial.
    Kamphuis D; van Eekelen R; van Welie N; Dreyer K; van Rijswijk J; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; van Baal WM; Traas MAF; van Peperstraten AM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; Lambeek AF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Tros R; Lambalk CB; Stoker J; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Jun; 39(6):1222-1230. PubMed ID: 38600625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.