These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance. Schafer S; Nithiananthan S; Mirota DJ; Uneri A; Stayman JW; Zbijewski W; Schmidgunst C; Kleinszig G; Khanna AJ; Siewerdsena JH Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4563-74. PubMed ID: 21928628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans. Veldhoen S; Schöllchen M; Hanken H; Precht C; Henes FO; Schön G; Nagel HD; Schumacher U; Heiland M; Adam G; Regier M Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):790-800. PubMed ID: 27169574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low-Dose Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Assessment of Alveolar Clefts: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Image Quality. Lemberger M; Regnstrand T; Karsten A; Benchimol D; Shi XQ Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Apr; 153(4):897-903. PubMed ID: 37092973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of 6 cone-beam computed tomography systems for image quality and detection of simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Nackaerts O; ; Willems G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e129-39. PubMed ID: 21889061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D cone-beam CT of the ankle using a novel twin robotic X-ray system: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose. Grunz JP; Kunz AS; Gietzen CH; Weng AM; Veyhl-Wichmann M; Ergün S; Schmitt R; Bley TA; Gassenmaier T Eur J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 119():108659. PubMed ID: 31520930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of subjective image quality, contrast to noise ratio and modulation transfer function in the middle ear using a novel full body cone beam computed tomography device. Heikkinen AK; Rissanen V; Aarnisalo AA; Nyman K; Sinkkonen ST; Koivisto J BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Apr; 23(1):51. PubMed ID: 37038130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated measurement for image distortion analysis in 2D panoramic imaging of dental CBCT system: A phantom study. Rabba JA; Suhaimi FM; Mat Jafri MZ; Jaafar HA; Osman ND Radiography (Lond); 2023 May; 29(3):533-538. PubMed ID: 36913788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of Simulated Vertical Root Fractures: Which Cone-beam Computed Tomographic System Is the Most Accurate? Elsaltani MH; Farid MM; Eldin Ashmawy MS J Endod; 2016 Jun; 42(6):972-7. PubMed ID: 27130336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kilovoltage cone-beam CT: comparative dose and image quality evaluations in partial and full-angle scan protocols. Kim S; Yoo S; Yin FF; Samei E; Yoshizumi T Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3648-59. PubMed ID: 20831072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultra-low-dose CBCT: new cornerstone of paranasal sinus imaging. Tamminen P; Jarnstedt J; Numminen J; Lehtinen A; Lehtimaki L; Rautiainen M; Kivekas I Rhinology; 2023 Jun; 61(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 37283512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultra-low-dose chest CT with iterative reconstruction does not alter anatomical image quality. Macri F; Greffier J; Pereira FR; Mandoul C; Khasanova E; Gualdi G; Beregi JP Diagn Interv Imaging; 2016 Nov; 97(11):1131-1140. PubMed ID: 27451261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Precision of orthodontic cephalometric measurements on ultra low dose-low dose CBCT reconstructed cephalograms. van Bunningen RH; Dijkstra PU; Dieters A; van der Meer WJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Ren Y Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1543-1550. PubMed ID: 34453209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]