These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36170041)

  • 1. The driver's instantaneous situation awareness when the alarm rings during the take-over of vehicle control in automated driving.
    Niu J; Zhang Z; Sun Y; Wang X; Ni J; Qin H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(8):478-482. PubMed ID: 36170041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In a heart beat: Using driver's physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in highly automated vehicles.
    Alrefaie MT; Summerskill S; Jackon TW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Oct; 131():180-190. PubMed ID: 31302486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Post Take-Over Performance Varies in Drivers of Automated and Connected Vehicle Technology in Near-Miss Scenarios.
    Yamani Y; Glassman J; Alruwaili A; Yahoodik SE; Davis E; Lugo S; Xie K; Ishak S
    Hum Factors; 2024 Nov; 66(11):2503-2517. PubMed ID: 38052019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106238. PubMed ID: 34182321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting driver's takeover time based on individual characteristics, external environment, and situation awareness.
    Chen H; Zhao X; Li H; Gong J; Fu Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107601. PubMed ID: 38718664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
    Shah D; Lee C
    J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
    Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What happens when drivers face hazards on the road?
    Ventsislavova P; Gugliotta A; Peña-Suarez E; Garcia-Fernandez P; Eisman E; Crundall D; Castro C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jun; 91():43-54. PubMed ID: 26954761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of non-driving related tasks while operating automated driving systems (ADS): A systematic review.
    Hungund AP; Kumar Pradhan A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107076. PubMed ID: 37150132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
    Gao J; Davis GA
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring Driver Perception: Combining Eye-Tracking and Automated Road Scene Perception.
    Stapel J; El Hassnaoui M; Happee R
    Hum Factors; 2022 Jun; 64(4):714-731. PubMed ID: 32993382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What can a hazard function teach us about drivers' perception of hazards?
    Parmet Y; Meir A; Borowsky A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(2):140-145. PubMed ID: 30888869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Drivers of partially automated vehicles are blamed for crashes that they cannot reasonably avoid.
    Beckers N; Siebert LC; Bruijnes M; Jonker C; Abbink D
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):16193. PubMed ID: 36171437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying visual road environment to establish a speeding prediction model: An examination using naturalistic driving data.
    Yu B; Chen Y; Bao S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():289-298. PubMed ID: 31177040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiovisual presentation of variable message signs improves message processing in distracted drivers during partially automated driving.
    Pi-Ruano M; Roca J; Tejero P
    J Safety Res; 2024 Jun; 89():172-180. PubMed ID: 38858040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The monitoring requests on young driver's fatigue and take-over performance in prolonged conditional automated driving.
    Yin J; Shao H; Zhang X
    J Safety Res; 2024 Feb; 88():285-292. PubMed ID: 38485370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.