BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36170279)

  • 1. A semi-supervised learning approach for automated 3D cephalometric landmark identification using computed tomography.
    Yun HS; Hyun CM; Baek SH; Lee SH; Seo JK
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0275114. PubMed ID: 36170279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning-based local-to-global landmark annotation for automatic 3D cephalometry.
    Yun HS; Jang TJ; Lee SM; Lee SH; Seo JK
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 65(8):085018. PubMed ID: 32101805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic 3D cephalometric annotation system using shadowed 2D image-based machine learning.
    Lee SM; Kim HP; Jeon K; Lee SH; Seo JK
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 64(5):055002. PubMed ID: 30669128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic 3-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmarking via Deep Learning.
    Dot G; Schouman T; Chang S; Rafflenbeul F; Kerbrat A; Rouch P; Gajny L
    J Dent Res; 2022 Oct; 101(11):1380-1387. PubMed ID: 35982646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fully automated landmarking and facial segmentation on 3D photographs.
    Berends B; Bielevelt F; Schreurs R; Vinayahalingam S; Maal T; de Jong G
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6463. PubMed ID: 38499700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hendrickx J; Gracea RS; Vanheers M; Winderickx N; Preda F; Shujaat S; Jacobs R
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Aug; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 38895901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses.
    Percival CJ; Devine J; Darwin BC; Liu W; van Eede M; Henkelman RM; Hallgrimsson B
    J Anat; 2019 Jun; 234(6):917-935. PubMed ID: 30901082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic cephalometric landmark identification with artificial intelligence: An umbrella review of systematic reviews.
    Polizzi A; Leonardi R
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105056. PubMed ID: 38729291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1297-309. PubMed ID: 26704370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of automated 3D cephalometric landmarks by deep learning algorithms: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Serafin M; Baldini B; Cabitza F; Carrafiello G; Baselli G; Del Fabbro M; Sforza C; Caprioglio A; Tartaglia GM
    Radiol Med; 2023 May; 128(5):544-555. PubMed ID: 37093337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3D Facial Landmark Localization for cephalometric analysis.
    Torres HR; Morais P; Fritze A; Oliveira B; Veloso F; Rudiger M; Fonseca JC; Vilaca JL
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():1016-1019. PubMed ID: 36083940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing semi-landmarking approaches for analyzing three-dimensional cranial morphology.
    Rolfe S; Davis C; Maga AM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2021 May; 175(1):227-237. PubMed ID: 33483951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and Validation of Novel Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Landmarks on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
    Liberton DK; Verma P; Contratto A; Lee JS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 30(7):e611-e615. PubMed ID: 31478954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hybrid approach for automatic cephalometric landmark annotation on cone-beam computed tomography volumes.
    Montúfar J; Romero M; Scougall-Vilchis RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jul; 154(1):140-150. PubMed ID: 29957312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Study on the method of automatically determining maxillary complex landmarks based on non-rigid registration algorithms].
    Gao ZX; Wang J; Wen AN; Zhu YJ; Qin QZ; Wang Y; Zhao YJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 58(6):554-560. PubMed ID: 37272000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic 3-dimensional cephalometric landmarking based on active shape models in related projections.
    Montúfar J; Romero M; Scougall-Vilchis RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Mar; 153(3):449-458. PubMed ID: 29501121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of maxillofacial landmark identification on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images of patients with mandibular prognathism: Comparative study of a tentative method and traditional cephalometric analysis.
    Fuyamada M; Shibata M; Nawa H; Yoshida K; Kise Y; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):966-73. PubMed ID: 24745629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new methodology for automatic detection of reference points in 3D cephalometry: A pilot study.
    Ed-Dhahraouy M; Riri H; Ezzahmouly M; Bourzgui F; El Moutaoukkil A
    Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):328-337. PubMed ID: 29628421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Newly defined landmarks for a three-dimensionally based cephalometric analysis: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography scan review.
    Lee M; Kanavakis G; Miner RM
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 24866835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.