These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36170314)

  • 1. Accuracy of Implant-Supported Copy Overdentures Fabricated Using Either an Intraoral Scanner and a 3D Printer or the Conventional Copy Denture Technique: A Comparative Study.
    Tanaka J; Murakami T; Tanaka S; Kanno T; Imada Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(5):989-996. PubMed ID: 36170314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study.
    Lo Russo L; Caradonna G; Troiano G; Salamini A; Guida L; Ciavarella D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 31153614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
    De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the Adaptation of Complete Dentures Fabricated Using Intraoral Scanning and Conventional Techniques.
    Masri G; Mortada R; Hatoum K; Al Harbi N; Boulos P; Salameh Z
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1384-1388. PubMed ID: 33893263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the retention system influence the stability of implant-supported maxillary overdentures? A comparison with fixed and conventional dentures.
    Michelon MMM; Posch AT; Sampaio-Filho HR; Lourenco EJV; Telles DM
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 30033158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective cohort pilot study of 2-visit CAD/CAM monolithic complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures: Clinical and patient-centered outcomes.
    Bidra AS; Farrell K; Burnham D; Dhingra A; Taylor TD; Kuo CL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 May; 115(5):578-586.e1. PubMed ID: 26794695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the Mean Bite Force and Masticatory Performance of Maxillary and Mandibular Complete Dentures vs Mandibular Implant-supported Over Denture.
    Kumar A; Karthik KVGC; Sunkala L; Bejagam V; Rathore KK; Rai P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 May; 23(5):513-519. PubMed ID: 35986459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The patient general satisfaction of mandibular single-implant overdentures and conventional complete dentures: Study protocol for a randomized crossover trial.
    Kanazawa M; Tanoue M; Miyayasu A; Takeshita S; Sato D; Asami M; Lam TV; Thu KM; Oda K; Komagamine Y; Minakuchi S; Feine J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 May; 97(20):e10721. PubMed ID: 29768340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Masticatory efficiency of implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with attachments compared with conventional dentures: an in vitro digital colorimetric image analysis.
    Salami ZA; Jasser EM; Makzoumé JED; Boulos PJA
    Gen Dent; 2020; 68(6):60-64. PubMed ID: 33136048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intaglio surface trueness of milled and 3D-printed digital maxillary and mandibular dentures: A clinical study.
    Lo Russo L; Guida L; Zhurakivska K; Troiano G; Chochlidakis K; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):131-139. PubMed ID: 34116839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The digitally replicated denture technique: A case report.
    Clark WA; Duqum I; Kowalski BJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Jan; 31(1):20-25. PubMed ID: 30537418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part I: Methodology and clinical outcomes.
    Kapur KK; Garrett NR; Hamada MO; Roumanas ED; Freymiller E; Han T; Diener RM; Levin S; Ida R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):555-69. PubMed ID: 9597609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of Reinforcement on Denture Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Study Under Various Implant Configurations.
    Takahashi T; Gonda T; Maeda Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):e162-e167. PubMed ID: 27861659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of digitally fabricated trial dentures.
    Wimmer T; Eichberger M; Lümkemann N; Stawarczyk B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jun; 119(6):942-947. PubMed ID: 28969915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maxillary complete denture outcome with two-implant supported mandibular overdentures. A systematic review.
    Rutkunas V; Mizutani H; Peciuliene V; Bendinskaite R; Linkevicius T
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 18493160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does a prosthodontist spend more time providing mandibular two-implant overdentures than conventional dentures?
    Takanashi Y; Penrod JR; Chehade A; Klemetti E; Savard A; Lund JP; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 12170856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychometric Analysis and Masticatory Efficiency of Elderly People with Single-Implant Overdentures.
    Amaral CF; Pinheiro MA; de Moraes M; Rodrigues Garcia RCM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1383-1389. PubMed ID: 30427971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
    Alshawaf B; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):835-842. PubMed ID: 29926977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of Palatal Coverage and Implant Distribution on Implant Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures.
    Takahashi T; Gonda T; Mizuno Y; Fujinami Y; Maeda Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):e136-42. PubMed ID: 27632280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
    MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.