These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36171611)
1. Empowering local research ethics review of antibacterial mass administration research. Sewankambo NK; Kutyabami P Infect Dis Poverty; 2022 Sep; 11(1):103. PubMed ID: 36171611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical challenges in mass drug administration for reducing childhood mortality: a qualitative study. Alasmar A; Kong AC; So AD; DeCamp M Infect Dis Poverty; 2022 Sep; 11(1):99. PubMed ID: 36114588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical challenges in global research on health system responses to violence against women: a qualitative study of policy and professional perspectives. Lewis NV; Kalichman B; Azeredo YN; Bacchus LJ; d'Oliveira AF BMC Med Ethics; 2024 Mar; 25(1):32. PubMed ID: 38504254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees. Klitzman R Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Forming and implementing community advisory boards in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Zhao Y; Fitzpatrick T; Wan B; Day S; Mathews A; Tucker JD BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Oct; 20(1):73. PubMed ID: 31623624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What Do Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiology Say About an Ethics Review? A Qualitative Systematic Review. Piasecki J; Waligora M; Dranseika V Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Jun; 23(3):743-768. PubMed ID: 27848192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries. Silverman H; Sleem H; Moodley K; Kumar N; Naidoo S; Subramanian T; Jaafar R; Moni M J Med Ethics; 2015 Apr; 41(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 24748650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research. American Society of Clinical Oncology J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols. Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Confidence of IRB/REC Members in Their Assessments of Human Research Risk: A Study of IRB/REC Decision Making in Action. Grinnell F; Sadler JZ; McNamara V; Senetar K; Reisch J J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Jul; 12(3):140-149. PubMed ID: 28558484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand. Ballantyne A; Moore A AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 30407144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ranking Research Methodology by Risk - a cross-sectional study to determine the opinion of research ethics committee members. Kolstoe SE; Durning J; Yost J; Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S Syst Rev; 2023 Sep; 12(1):154. PubMed ID: 37658420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomedical Research Ethics Committees in sub-Saharan Africa: a collective review of their structure, functioning, and outcomes. Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 25819759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Familiar ethical issues amplified: how members of research ethics committees describe ethical distinctions between disaster and non-disaster research. Tansey CM; Anderson J; Boulanger RF; Eckenwiler L; Pringle J; Schwartz L; Hunt M BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Jun; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 28659166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences between research ethics committees. Edwards SJ; Stone T; Swift T Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 17234012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Call for Better, Not Faster, Research Ethics Committee Reviews in the Covid-19 Era. Tamariz L; Hendler FJ; Wells JM; Anderson A; Bartlett S Ethics Hum Res; 2021 Sep; 43(5):42-44. PubMed ID: 34496160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The readiness of the Asian research ethics committees in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country survey. Karbwang J; Torres CE; Navarro AM; Wongwai P; Jimenez EB; Shetty Y; Ramalingam S; Koli P; Amir L; Rachmawati SD; Waworundeng M; Rizki H; Noor ASM; Ghimire P; Gyanwali P; Sharma S; Ghimire N; Wanigatunge C; Yimtae K F1000Res; 2024; 13():19. PubMed ID: 39165349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees. Burgess T; Rennie S; Moodley K BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Feb; 24(1):11. PubMed ID: 36793067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical review procedures in international internet-based intervention studies. Looijmans A; Spahrkäs SS; Sanderman R; Hagedoorn M Internet Interv; 2022 Apr; 28():100487. PubMed ID: 35646602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]