These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36172237)
1. Differences in public and producer attitudes toward animal welfare in the red meat industries. Coleman GJ; Hemsworth PH; Hemsworth LM; Munoz CA; Rice M Front Psychol; 2022; 13():875221. PubMed ID: 36172237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving Communication in the Red Meat Industry: Opinion Leaders May Be Used to Inform the Public About Farm Practices and Their Animal Welfare Implications. Munoz CA; Hemsworth LM; Hemsworth PH; Rice M; Coleman GJ Front Psychol; 2022; 13():876034. PubMed ID: 35983191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of a Negative Media Event on Public Attitudes Towards Animal Welfare in the Red Meat Industry. Rice M; Hemsworth LM; Hemsworth PH; Coleman GJ Animals (Basel); 2020 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 32260202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Telephone Survey Versus Panel Survey Samples Assessing Knowledge, Attitudes and Behavior Regarding Animal Welfare in the Red Meat Industry in Australia. Hemsworth LM; Rice M; Hemsworth PH; Coleman GJ Front Psychol; 2021; 12():581928. PubMed ID: 33897517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Australian beef producers' knowledge and attitudes relating to hydatid disease are associated with their control practices. Wilson CS; Jenkins DJ; Barnes TS; Brookes VJ Prev Vet Med; 2020 Sep; 182():105078. PubMed ID: 32707375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing attitudes toward farm animal welfare: a national survey of animal science faculty members. Heleski CR; Mertig AG; Zanella AJ J Anim Sci; 2004 Sep; 82(9):2806-14. PubMed ID: 15446498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Understanding the vulnerability of beef producers in Australia to an FMD outbreak using a Bayesian Network predictive model. Manyweathers J; Maru Y; Hayes L; Loechel B; Kruger H; Mankad A; Xie G; Woodgate R; Hernandez-Jover M Prev Vet Med; 2020 Feb; 175():104872. PubMed ID: 31981953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bill E. Kunkle Interdisciplinary Beef Symposium: Practical developments in managing animal welfare in beef cattle: what does the future hold? Lyles JL; Calvo-Lorenzo MS J Anim Sci; 2014 Dec; 92(12):5334-44. PubMed ID: 25253809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "I Feel Sorry for Them": Australian Meat Consumers' Perceptions about Sheep and Beef Cattle Transportation. Buddle EA; Bray HJ; Ankeny RA Animals (Basel); 2018 Oct; 8(10):. PubMed ID: 30282909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Producer practices and attitudes: Non-replacement male calf management in the Australian dairy industry. Vicic V; Saliba AJ; Campbell MA; Xie G; Quinn JC Front Vet Sci; 2022; 9():979035. PubMed ID: 36204288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dairy producer attitudes to pain in cattle in relation to disbudding calves. Wikman I; Hokkanen AH; Pastell M; Kauppinen T; Valros A; Hänninen L J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(11):6894-6903. PubMed ID: 24054284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Balancing consumer and societal requirements for sheep meat production: an Australasian perspective. Ferguson DM; Schreurs NM; Kenyon PR; Jacob RH Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 25015875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Progress With Livestock Welfare in Extensive Production Systems: Lessons From Australia. Windsor PA Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():674482. PubMed ID: 34422941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Animal welfare in GLOBALG.A.P.'s integrated farm assurance standard for livestock: an industry perspective and example of a private and globally acting quality assurance system. Aumüller RK; Coetzer E Rev Sci Tech; 2020 Apr; 39(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 32729565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stakeholder Perceptions of Welfare Issues and Indicators for Extensively Managed Sheep in Australia. Doughty AK; Coleman GJ; Hinch GN; Doyle RE Animals (Basel); 2017 Mar; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 28333110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influences on Perceived Feasibility of Animal-Based Measures in a Producer-Driven Welfare Benchmarking System. Salvin H; Monk JE; Cafe LM; Harden S; Lee C Animals (Basel); 2024 Sep; 14(18):. PubMed ID: 39335256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Harnessing the value of reproductive hormones in cattle production with considerations to animal welfare and human health. Evans HC; Briggs EF; Burnett RH; Contreras-Correa ZE; Duvic MA; Dysart LM; Gilmore AA; Messman RD; Reid D; Rasit Ugur M; Kaya A; Memili E J Anim Sci; 2022 Jul; 100(7):. PubMed ID: 35772763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biosecurity and the management of emergency animal disease among commercial beef producers in New South Wales and Queensland (Australia). Hernández-Jover M; Higgins V; Bryant M; Rast L; McShane C Prev Vet Med; 2016 Nov; 134():92-102. PubMed ID: 27836050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Livestock hauliers' attitudes, knowledge and current practices towards animal welfare, occupational wellbeing and transport risk factors: A Mexican survey. Valadez-Noriega M; Estévez-Moreno LX; Rayas-Amor AA; Rubio-Lozano MS; Galindo F; Miranda-de la Lama GC Prev Vet Med; 2018 Nov; 160():76-84. PubMed ID: 30389001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]