These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Is It Possible to Measure the Amount of the SMAS Face Lift According to Facial Vectors? Barbosa MVJ; Bianchi T; Nahas FX; Ferreira LM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):570e-571e. PubMed ID: 33395006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Three-dimensional endoscopic midface enhancement: a personal quest for the ideal cheek rejuvenation. Ramirez OM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jan; 109(1):329-40; discussion 341-9. PubMed ID: 11786834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Midface effects of the deep-plane vs the superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication face-lift. Adamson PA; Dahiya R; Litner J Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2007; 9(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 17224481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The minimal access deep plane extended vertical facelift. Jacono AA; Parikh SS Aesthet Surg J; 2011 Nov; 31(8):874-90. PubMed ID: 22065880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The contribution of the SMAS to the blood supply in the lateral face lift flap. Whetzel TP; Stevenson TR Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Sep; 100(4):1011-8. PubMed ID: 9290672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Novel Volumizing Extended Deep-Plane Facelift: Using Composite Flap Shifts to Volumize the Midface and Jawline. Jacono AA Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2020 Aug; 28(3):331-368. PubMed ID: 32503718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Facial Fat Compartments Revisited: Clinical Relevance to Subcutaneous Dissection and Facial Deflation in Face Lifting. Stuzin JM; Rohrich RJ; Dayan E Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Nov; 144(5):1070-1078. PubMed ID: 31688754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Facial Anatomy for Filler Injection: The Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System (SMAS) Is Not Just for Facelifting. Surek CC Clin Plast Surg; 2019 Oct; 46(4):603-612. PubMed ID: 31514811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Super-High SMAS Facelift Technique with Tailor Tack Plication. Guyuron B; Seyed Forootan NS; Katira K Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Dec; 42(6):1531-1539. PubMed ID: 30232555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Update on minimally invasive face lift technique. del Campo AF Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(1):51-61; discussion 62. PubMed ID: 19083506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. High SMAS facelift: combined single flap lifting of the jawline, cheek, and midface. Marten TJ Clin Plast Surg; 2008 Oct; 35(4):569-603, vi-vii. PubMed ID: 18922311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A study of the long-term effect of malar fat repositioning in face lift surgery: short-term success but long-term failure. Hamra ST Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Sep; 110(3):940-51; discussion 952-9. PubMed ID: 12172164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The safe face lift with bony anatomic landmarks to elevate the SMAS. Wilhelmi BJ; Mowlavi A; Neumeister MW Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Apr; 111(5):1723-6. PubMed ID: 12655222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Skin Excursion with Cannula Lipodissection and the Anatomical Implications of Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Movement in the Tumescent Face Lift. Mirzabeigi MN; Stark RY; Chang CS; Weissler JM; Carney MJ; Bucky LP Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Aug; 146(2):269-276. PubMed ID: 32740573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]