These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36174099)

  • 21. Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios.
    Bohnengel B; Patiño-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9908-16. PubMed ID: 25025127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage.
    Zhai H; Rubin ES; Versteeg PL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2479-85. PubMed ID: 21329343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Role of natural gas in meeting an electric sector emissions reduction strategy and effects on greenhouse gas emissions.
    Lenox C; Kaplan PO
    Energy Econ; 2016; 60():460-468. PubMed ID: 32632338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Long-term energy and climate implications of carbon capture and storage deployment strategies in the US coal-fired electricity fleet.
    Sathre R; Masanet E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(17):9768-76. PubMed ID: 22857130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of three recent coal-fired power plant closings on Pittsburgh air quality: A natural experiment.
    Russell MC; Belle JH; Liu Y
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Jan; 67(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 27027572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accelerated reduction in SO₂ emissions from the U.S. power sector triggered by changing prices of natural gas.
    Lu X; McElroy MB; Wu G; Nielsen CP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(14):7882-9. PubMed ID: 22724530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impacts of the Minamata convention on mercury emissions and global deposition from coal-fired power generation in Asia.
    Giang A; Stokes LC; Streets DG; Corbitt ES; Selin NE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 May; 49(9):5326-35. PubMed ID: 25851589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Current Emissions and Future Mitigation Pathways of Coal-Fired Power Plants in China from 2010 to 2030.
    Tong D; Zhang Q; Liu F; Geng G; Zheng Y; Xue T; Hong C; Wu R; Qin Y; Zhao H; Yan L; He K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Nov; 52(21):12905-12914. PubMed ID: 30249091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Natural gas fugitive emissions rates constrained by global atmospheric methane and ethane.
    Schwietzke S; Griffin WM; Matthews HS; Bruhwiler LM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7714-22. PubMed ID: 24945600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Climate-Water Adaptation for Future US Electricity Infrastructure.
    Miara A; Cohen SM; Macknick J; Vörösmarty CJ; Corsi F; Sun Y; Tidwell VC; Newmark R; Fekete BM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Dec; 53(23):14029-14040. PubMed ID: 31746591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Postcombustion Capture or Direct Air Capture in Decarbonizing US Natural Gas Power?
    Azarabadi H; Lackner KS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Apr; 54(8):5102-5111. PubMed ID: 32212696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Shale gas development in China: Implications for indoor and outdoor air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.
    Zhang Y; Wang H; Han Y; Wang D; Zhu G; Lu X
    Environ Int; 2020 Aug; 141():105727. PubMed ID: 32371251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Harmonization of initial estimates of shale gas life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for electric power generation.
    Heath GA; O'Donoughue P; Arent DJ; Bazilian M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Aug; 111(31):E3167-76. PubMed ID: 25049378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Clark VR; Herzog HJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Future methane emissions from the heavy-duty natural gas transportation sector for stasis, high, medium, and low scenarios in 2035.
    Clark NN; Johnson DR; McKain DL; Wayne WS; Li H; Rudek J; Mongold RA; Sandoval C; Covington AN; Hailer JT
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Dec; 67(12):1328-1341. PubMed ID: 28829681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Regional ozone impacts of increased natural gas use in the Texas power sector and development in the Eagle Ford shale.
    Pacsi AP; Kimura Y; McGaughey G; McDonald-Buller EC; Allen DT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(6):3966-73. PubMed ID: 25723953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spatially and Temporally Resolved Analysis of Environmental Trade-Offs in Electricity Generation.
    Peer RA; Garrison JB; Timms CP; Sanders KT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(8):4537-45. PubMed ID: 26967826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Environmental impact of coal industry and thermal power plants in India.
    Mishra UC
    J Environ Radioact; 2004; 72(1-2):35-40. PubMed ID: 15162853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hydrogen emissions from the hydrogen value chain-emissions profile and impact to global warming.
    Cooper J; Dubey L; Bakkaloglu S; Hawkes A
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jul; 830():154624. PubMed ID: 35307429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Identifying/Quantifying Environmental Trade-offs Inherent in GHG Reduction Strategies for Coal-Fired Power.
    Schivley G; Ingwersen WW; Marriott J; Hawkins TR; Skone TJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7562-70. PubMed ID: 26001040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.