These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36174261)

  • 1. Memory failure predicts belief regression after the correction of misinformation.
    Swire-Thompson B; Dobbs M; Thomas A; DeGutis J
    Cognition; 2023 Jan; 230():105276. PubMed ID: 36174261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon.
    Swire B; Berinsky AJ; Lewandowsky S; Ecker UK
    R Soc Open Sci; 2017 Mar; 4(3):160802. PubMed ID: 28405366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the role of memory in misinformation corrections: Repeated exposure, correction durability, and source credibility.
    Kemp PL; Goldman AC; Wahlheim CN
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2024 Apr; 56():101783. PubMed ID: 38171060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vaccination against misinformation: The inoculation technique reduces the continued influence effect.
    Buczel KA; Szyszka PD; Siwiak A; Szpitalak M; Polczyk R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267463. PubMed ID: 35482715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reminders of Everyday Misinformation Statements Can Enhance Memory for and Beliefs in Corrections of Those Statements in the Short Term.
    Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Peske CD
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1325-1339. PubMed ID: 32976064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The backfire effect after correcting misinformation is strongly associated with reliability.
    Swire-Thompson B; Miklaucic N; Wihbey JP; Lazer D; DeGutis J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jul; 151(7):1655-1665. PubMed ID: 35130012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correcting eyewitness suggestibility: does explanatory role predict resistance to correction?
    Braun BE; Zaragoza MS; Chrobak QM; Ithisuphalap J
    Memory; 2021 Jan; 29(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 33290185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fake news reminders and veracity labels differentially benefit memory and belief accuracy for news headlines.
    Kemp PL; Loaiza VM; Wahlheim CN
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21829. PubMed ID: 36528666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Post-learning stress reduces the misinformation effect: effects of psychosocial stress on memory updating.
    Nitschke JP; Chu S; Pruessner JC; Bartz JA; Sheldon S
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2019 Apr; 102():164-171. PubMed ID: 30562688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining the replicability of backfire effects after standalone corrections.
    Prike T; Blackley P; Swire-Thompson B; Ecker UKH
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Jul; 8(1):39. PubMed ID: 37395864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanisms in continued influence: The impact of misinformation corrections on source perceptions.
    Westbrook V; Wegener DT; Susmann MW
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1317-1330. PubMed ID: 36988856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple-choice quizzes improve memory for misinformation debunks, but do not reduce belief in misinformation.
    Collier JR; Pillai RM; Fazio LK
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Jun; 8(1):37. PubMed ID: 37278735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does evaluating belief prior to its retraction influence the efficacy of later corrections?
    Ithisuphalap J; Rich PR; Zaragoza MS
    Memory; 2020 May; 28(5):617-631. PubMed ID: 32302243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information.
    Swire B; Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1948-1961. PubMed ID: 28504531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of source expertise and trustworthiness on recollection: the case of vaccine misinformation.
    Pluviano S; Della Sala S; Watt C
    Cogn Process; 2020 Aug; 21(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 32333126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disowned recollections: denying true experiences undermines belief in occurrence but not judgments of remembering.
    Mazzoni G; Clark A; Nash RA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():139-46. PubMed ID: 24345675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating and Improving the Accuracy of US Citizens' Beliefs About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Survey Study.
    van Stekelenburg A; Schaap G; Veling H; Buijzen M
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jan; 23(1):e24069. PubMed ID: 33351776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correcting vaccine misinformation: A failure to replicate familiarity or fear-driven backfire effects.
    Ecker UKH; Sharkey CXM; Swire-Thompson B
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0281140. PubMed ID: 37043493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correcting false information in memory: manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Swire B; Chang D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Jun; 18(3):570-8. PubMed ID: 21359617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Keeping track of 'alternative facts': The neural correlates of processing misinformation corrections.
    Gordon A; Quadflieg S; Brooks JCW; Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jun; 193():46-56. PubMed ID: 30872047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.