202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36175208)
1. A SART data cost-effectiveness analysis of planned oocyte cryopreservation versus in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy considering ideal family size.
Bakkensen JB; Flannagan KSJ; Mumford SL; Hutchinson AP; Cheung EO; Moreno PI; Jordan N; Feinberg EC; Goldman KN
Fertil Steril; 2022 Nov; 118(5):875-884. PubMed ID: 36175208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using a matched propensity score design.
Haviland MJ; Murphy LA; Modest AM; Fox MP; Wise LA; Nillni YI; Sakkas D; Hacker MR
Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2356-2364. PubMed ID: 32856053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. To test or not to test? A framework for counselling patients on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).
Murphy LA; Seidler EA; Vaughan DA; Resetkova N; Penzias AS; Toth TL; Thornton KL; Sakkas D
Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb; 34(2):268-275. PubMed ID: 30500907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): a SART-CORS study.
Bhatt SJ; Marchetto NM; Roy J; Morelli SS; McGovern PG
Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul; 36(8):2339-2344. PubMed ID: 34027546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Donor oocyte recipients do not benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to improve pregnancy outcomes.
Doyle N; Gainty M; Eubanks A; Doyle J; Hayes H; Tucker M; Devine K; DeCherney A; Levy M; Jahandideh S; Hill M
Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2548-2555. PubMed ID: 33057600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilisation.
Cornelisse S; Zagers M; Kostova E; Fleischer K; van Wely M; Mastenbroek S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Sep; 9(9):CD005291. PubMed ID: 32898291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimizing mosaicism: assessing the impact of fertilization method on rate of mosaicism after next-generation sequencing (NGS) preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).
Palmerola KL; Vitez SF; Amrane S; Fischer CP; Forman EJ
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Jan; 36(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 30362056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Looking past the appearance: a comprehensive description of the clinical contribution of poor-quality blastocysts to increase live birth rates during cycles with aneuploidy testing.
Cimadomo D; Soscia D; Vaiarelli A; Maggiulli R; Capalbo A; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jul; 34(7):1206-1214. PubMed ID: 31247100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Planned oocyte cryopreservation-10-15-year follow-up: return rates and cycle outcomes.
Blakemore JK; Grifo JA; DeVore SM; Hodes-Wertz B; Berkeley AS
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jun; 115(6):1511-1520. PubMed ID: 33712289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What is the reproductive potential of day 7 euploid embryos?
Hernandez-Nieto C; Lee JA; Slifkin R; Sandler B; Copperman AB; Flisser E
Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 31398251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is cost-effective, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage.
Neal SA; Morin SJ; Franasiak JM; Goodman LR; Juneau CR; Forman EJ; Werner MD; Scott RT
Fertil Steril; 2018 Oct; 110(5):896-904. PubMed ID: 30316435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pregnancy outcomes from more than 1,800 in vitro fertilization cycles with the use of 24-chromosome single-nucleotide polymorphism-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.
Simon AL; Kiehl M; Fischer E; Proctor JG; Bush MR; Givens C; Rabinowitz M; Demko ZP
Fertil Steril; 2018 Jul; 110(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 29908770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A major increase in oocyte cryopreservation cycles in the USA, Australia and New Zealand since 2010 is highlighted by younger women but a need for standardized data collection.
Johnston M; Richings NM; Leung A; Sakkas D; Catt S
Hum Reprod; 2021 Feb; 36(3):624-635. PubMed ID: 33367704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting the likelihood of human embryo euploidy based on blastocyst images from multiple imaging systems during IVF.
Diakiw SM; Hall JMM; VerMilyea MD; Amin J; Aizpurua J; Giardini L; Briones YG; Lim AYX; Dakka MA; Nguyen TV; Perugini D; Perugini M
Hum Reprod; 2022 Jul; 37(8):1746-1759. PubMed ID: 35674312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From oocytes to a live birth: Are we improving the biological efficiency?
Sabbagh R; Mulligan S; Shah J; Korkidakis A; Penzias A; Vaughan D; Patrizio P; Sakkas D
Fertil Steril; 2023 Dec; 120(6):1210-1219. PubMed ID: 37678730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic role of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in medically indicated fertility preservation.
Blakemore JK; Trawick EC; Grifo JA; Goldman KN
Fertil Steril; 2020 Feb; 113(2):408-416. PubMed ID: 31973902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling of live-birth rates and cost-effectiveness of oocyte cryopreservation for cancer patients prior to high- and low-risk gonadotoxic chemotherapy.
Lyttle Schumacher B; Grover N; Mesen T; Steiner A; Mersereau J
Hum Reprod; 2017 Oct; 32(10):2049-2055. PubMed ID: 28938728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in the United States: an analysis of cost and birth outcomes from 158,665 in vitro fertilization cycles.
Lee M; Lofgren KT; Thomas A; Lanes A; Goldman R; Ginsburg ES; Hornstein MD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 225(1):55.e1-55.e17. PubMed ID: 33539823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptions, motivations and decision regret surrounding preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.
Kaing A; Rosen MP; Quinn MM
Hum Reprod; 2020 Sep; 35(9):2047-2057. PubMed ID: 32756971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence-based outcomes after oocyte cryopreservation for donor oocyte in vitro fertilization and planned oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline.
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jul; 116(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 34148587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
