BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36175209)

  • 1. Systematic review of subsequent pregnancy outcomes in couples with parental abnormal chromosomal karyotypes and recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Li S; Zheng PS; Ma HM; Feng Q; Zhang YR; Li QS; He JJ; Liu WF
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Nov; 118(5):906-914. PubMed ID: 36175209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevalence and Treatment Choices for Couples with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Due to Structural Chromosomal Anomalies.
    Maithripala S; Durland U; Havelock J; Kashyap S; Hitkari J; Tan J; Iews M; Lisonkova S; Bedaiwy MA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Jun; 40(6):655-662. PubMed ID: 29276169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Natural Conception: A Comparison of Live Birth Rates in Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Associated with Translocation.
    Ikuma S; Sato T; Sugiura-Ogasawara M; Nagayoshi M; Tanaka A; Takeda S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129958. PubMed ID: 26083495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproductive outcomes in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss after embryonic chromosomal microarray analysis.
    Li Y; Zhou R; Xia Z; Meng L; Huang M; Hu P; Xu Z; Wang Y
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Jan; 41(1):161-170. PubMed ID: 37874532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure.
    Sato T; Sugiura-Ogasawara M; Ozawa F; Yamamoto T; Kato T; Kurahashi H; Kuroda T; Aoyama N; Kato K; Kobayashi R; Fukuda A; Utsunomiya T; Kuwahara A; Saito H; Takeshita T; Irahara M
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Dec; 34(12):2340-2348. PubMed ID: 31811307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does preimplantation genetic diagnosis improve reproductive outcome in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss owing to structural chromosomal rearrangement? A systematic review.
    Iews M; Tan J; Taskin O; Alfaraj S; AbdelHafez FF; Abdellah AH; Bedaiwy MA
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2018 Jun; 36(6):677-685. PubMed ID: 29627226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): a SART-CORS study.
    Bhatt SJ; Marchetto NM; Roy J; Morelli SS; McGovern PG
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul; 36(8):2339-2344. PubMed ID: 34027546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of 1100 couples with recurrent pregnancy loss using conventional cytogenetic, PGD, and PGS: hype or hope.
    Farahmand K; Kalantari H; Fakhri M; Fazeli AS; Moradi SZ; Almadani N; Hashemi M; Gourabi H; Mohseni-Meybodi A
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2016 Jun; 32(6):483-7. PubMed ID: 26854690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recurrent miscarriage in translocation carriers: no differences in clinical characteristics between couples who accept and couples who decline PGD.
    De Krom G; Arens YH; Coonen E; Van Ravenswaaij-Arts CM; Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Evers JL; Van Golde RJ; De Die-Smulders CE
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):484-9. PubMed ID: 25432924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intent to treat analysis of in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic screening versus expectant management in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Murugappan G; Shahine LK; Perfetto CO; Hickok LR; Lathi RB
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1668-74. PubMed ID: 27278003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients.
    Popescu F; Jaslow CR; Kutteh WH
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr; 33(4):579-587. PubMed ID: 29538673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of preimplantation genetic screening and in vitro fertilization versus expectant management in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Murugappan G; Ohno MS; Lathi RB
    Fertil Steril; 2015 May; 103(5):1215-20. PubMed ID: 25772770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of parental abnormal chromosomal karyotype and subsequent live births in Chinese couples with recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Li S; Chen M; Zheng PS
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20298. PubMed ID: 34645840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis using FISH analysis for recurrent miscarriage in low-risk reciprocal translocation carriers.
    Pundir J; Magdalani L; El-Toukhy T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():214-9. PubMed ID: 27343738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Embryo selection with preimplantation chromosomal screening in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Shahine LK; Lathi RB
    Semin Reprod Med; 2014 Mar; 32(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 24515903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of paternal and maternal factors on the prognosis of live birth in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Peuranpää PL; Gissler M; Peltopuro P; Tiitinen A; Hautamäki H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Dec; 101(12):1374-1385. PubMed ID: 36210542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pregnancy outcomes following 24-chromosome preimplantation genetic diagnosis in couples with balanced reciprocal or Robertsonian translocations.
    Idowu D; Merrion K; Wemmer N; Mash JG; Pettersen B; Kijacic D; Lathi RB
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):1037-42. PubMed ID: 25712573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproductive outcome and fetal karyotype of couples with recurrent miscarriages.
    Zhang S; Gao L; Liu Y; Tan J; Wang Y; Zhang R; Liu Y; Chen H; Zhang J
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2014; 41(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 24992770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. External validation of a frequently used prediction model for ongoing pregnancy in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Youssef A; van der Hoorn MLP; Dongen M; Visser J; Bloemenkamp K; van Lith J; van Geloven N; Lashley EELO
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 37(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 34875054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Squaring the circle of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).
    Scriven PN
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 May; 37(5):1067-1068. PubMed ID: 32409984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.