These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3617521)
1. The Münsterberg figure and twisted cords. Morgan MJ; Moulden B Vision Res; 1986; 26(11):1793-800. PubMed ID: 3617521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new illusion and possible links with the Münsterberg and Fraser illusions of direction. Taylor SP; Woodhouse JM Perception; 1980; 9(4):479-81. PubMed ID: 7422465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fraser cords and reversal of the café wall illusion. Earle DC; Maskell SJ Perception; 1993; 22(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 8378129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-dimensional filtering, oriented line detectors, and figural aspects as determinants of visual illusions. Eijkman EG; Jongsma HJ; Vincent J Percept Psychophys; 1981 Apr; 29(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 7279558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A new visual illusion, and its mechanism. Haig ND Perception; 1989; 18(3):333-45. PubMed ID: 2798017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of orientation-selective adaptation on the Zöllner illusion. Morikawa K Perception; 1987; 16(4):473-83. PubMed ID: 3444730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retinal projection or size constancy as determinants of the horizontal-vertical illusion? von Collani G Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Oct; 61(2):547-57. PubMed ID: 4069920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial and orientation specific integration in the tilt illusion. Johnstone S; Wenderoth P Perception; 1989; 18(1):5-23. PubMed ID: 2771594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing the tilt-constancy theory of visual illusions. Wenderoth P; Burke D Perception; 2006; 35(2):201-13. PubMed ID: 16583766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The orthogonal orientation shift and spatial filtering. Morgan MJ; Medford A; Newsome P Perception; 1995; 24(5):513-24. PubMed ID: 7567427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influences of prolonged viewing of tilted lines on perceived line orientation: the normalization and tilt after-effect. Vaitkevicius H; Viliunas V; Bliumas R; Stanikunas R; Svegzda A; Dzekeviciute A; Kulikowski JJ J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2009 Jul; 26(7):1553-63. PubMed ID: 19568290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Fraser illusion without local cues? Popple AV; Sagi D Vision Res; 2000; 40(8):873-8. PubMed ID: 10720659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revisitation of the family tie between Münsterberg and Taylor-Woodhouse illusions. Bressan P Perception; 1985; 14(5):579-85. PubMed ID: 3836390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stereoacuity testing: an illusion of tilt when viewing two parallel vertical rods or lines. Larson WL; Gresset J; Bolduc M; Thibault L Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Aug; 65(8):632-6. PubMed ID: 3177588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Awareness is the key to attraction: dissociating the tilt illusions via conscious perception. Tomassini A; Solomon JA J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25311303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cooperative representation of visual borders. Stuart GW; Bossomaier TR Perception; 1992; 21(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 1513668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new illusion demonstrates long-range processing. Popple AV; Levi DM Vision Res; 2000; 40(19):2545-9. PubMed ID: 10958905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]