These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36175300)

  • 21. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of linear and nonlinear speech rate changes on speech intelligibility in stationary and fluctuating maskers.
    Cooke M; Aubanel V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4126. PubMed ID: 28618803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modulation masking and fine structure shape neural envelope coding to predict speech intelligibility across diverse listening conditions.
    Viswanathan V; Bharadwaj HM; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Heinz MG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Sep; 150(3):2230. PubMed ID: 34598642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of spatial separation in distance on the intelligibility of speech in rooms.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):757-67. PubMed ID: 25698010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contribution of binaural masking release to improved speech intelligibility for different masker types.
    Sutojo S; van de Par S; Schoenmaker E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 51(5):1339-1352. PubMed ID: 29855098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spectro-temporal modulation detection and its relation to speech perception in children with auditory processing disorder.
    Lotfi Y; Moossavi A; Afshari PJ; Bakhshi E; Sadjedi H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 131():109860. PubMed ID: 31958768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech intelligibility prediction based on modulation frequency-selective processing.
    Relaño-Iborra H; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108610. PubMed ID: 36163219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors influencing glimpsing of speech in noise.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1165-72. PubMed ID: 17672662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Better-ear glimpsing efficiency with symmetrically-placed interfering talkers.
    Brungart DS; Iyer N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2545-56. PubMed ID: 23039448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of short-time intensity and envelope power for speech intelligibility and psychoacoustic masking.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1098. PubMed ID: 28863616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Glimpsing speech interrupted by speech-modulated noise.
    Miller RE; Gibbs BE; Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):3058. PubMed ID: 29857765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Efficiency in glimpsing vowel sequences in fluctuating makers: Effects of temporal fine structure and temporal regularity.
    Shen Y; Pearson DV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2518. PubMed ID: 31046353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Better-ear glimpsing in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Best V; Mason CR; Kidd G; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL213-9. PubMed ID: 25698053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Toward a clinically viable spectro-temporal modulation test for predicting supra-threshold speech reception in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Zaar J; Simonsen LB; Dau T; Laugesen S
    Hear Res; 2023 Jan; 427():108650. PubMed ID: 36463632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.