These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36175300)

  • 41. Toward a clinically viable spectro-temporal modulation test for predicting supra-threshold speech reception in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Zaar J; Simonsen LB; Dau T; Laugesen S
    Hear Res; 2023 Jan; 427():108650. PubMed ID: 36463632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.
    Fogerty D; Xu J; Gibbs BE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1800. PubMed ID: 27914381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Relationship between speech recognition in noise and sparseness.
    Li G; Lutman ME; Wang S; Bleeck S
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 22107445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Modelling speech intelligibility in adverse conditions.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():343-51. PubMed ID: 23716240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Modifying the normalized covariance metric measure to account for nonlinear distortions introduced by noise-reduction algorithms.
    Chen F; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL405-11. PubMed ID: 23656101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.
    Kim G; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1581-96. PubMed ID: 21895096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Use of a glimpsing model to understand the performance of listeners with and without hearing loss in spatialized speech mixtures.
    Best V; Mason CR; Swaminathan J; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):81. PubMed ID: 28147587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The role of reliable interaural time difference cues in ambiguous binaural signals for the intelligibility of multitalker speech.
    Schoenmaker E; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):4041. PubMed ID: 32611159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of linguistic experience on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral masker modulation.
    Calandruccio L; Buss E; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1335-43. PubMed ID: 24606272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Extending the articulation index to account for non-linear distortions introduced by noise-suppression algorithms.
    Loizou PC; Ma J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):986-95. PubMed ID: 21877811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Mehraei G; Shamma S; Gallun FJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 23636210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Kim G; Lu Y; Hu Y; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1486-94. PubMed ID: 19739761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
    Cao S; Li L; Wu X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech: Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners.
    Bhargava P; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 17(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 27090115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Sentence recognition in noise promoting or suppressing masking release by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kwon BJ; Perry TT; Wilhelm CL; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):3111-9. PubMed ID: 22501084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility.
    Gilbert RC; Chandrasekaran B; Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 24437779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A metric for predicting binaural speech intelligibility in stationary noise and competing speech maskers.
    Tang Y; Cooke M; Fazenda BM; Cox TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1858. PubMed ID: 27914424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The intelligibility of speech in a harmonic masker varying in fundamental frequency contour, broadband temporal envelope, and spatial location.
    Leclère T; Lavandier M; Deroche MLD
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():1-10. PubMed ID: 28390253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.