291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36176461)
1. Review of
Sellami A; Réau M; Montes M; Lagarde N
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():986016. PubMed ID: 36176461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting Potential Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Binding to Estrogen Receptor α (ERα) Using a Pipeline Combining Structure-Based and Ligand-Based in Silico Methods.
Sellami A; Montes M; Lagarde N
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 33799614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computational methods on food contact chemicals: Big data and in silico screening on nuclear receptors family.
Cozzini P; Cavaliere F; Spaggiari G; Morelli G; Riani M
Chemosphere; 2022 Apr; 292():133422. PubMed ID: 34971624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Molecular Image-Based Prediction Models of Nuclear Receptor Agonists and Antagonists Using the DeepSnap-Deep Learning Approach with the Tox21 10K Library.
Matsuzaka Y; Uesawa Y
Molecules; 2020 Jun; 25(12):. PubMed ID: 32549344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual screening of potentially endocrine-disrupting chemicals against nuclear receptors and its application to identify PPARγ-bound fatty acids.
Jaladanki CK; He Y; Zhao LN; Maurer-Stroh S; Loo LH; Song H; Fan H
Arch Toxicol; 2021 Jan; 95(1):355-374. PubMed ID: 32909075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advantages of cell-based high-volume screening assays to assess nuclear receptor activation during drug discovery.
Pinne M; Raucy JL
Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2014 Jun; 9(6):669-86. PubMed ID: 24819724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contributions of computational chemistry and biophysical techniques to fragment-based drug discovery.
Gozalbes R; Carbajo RJ; Pineda-Lucena A
Curr Med Chem; 2010; 17(17):1769-94. PubMed ID: 20345344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integration of in silico methods and computational systems biology to explore endocrine-disrupting chemical binding with nuclear hormone receptors.
Ruiz P; Sack A; Wampole M; Bobst S; Vracko M
Chemosphere; 2017 Jul; 178():99-109. PubMed ID: 28319747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The integration of pharmacophore-based 3D QSAR modeling and virtual screening in safety profiling: A case study to identify antagonistic activities against adenosine receptor, A2A, using 1,897 known drugs.
Fan F; Toledo Warshaviak D; Hamadeh HK; Dunn RT
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0204378. PubMed ID: 30605479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hits Discovery on the Androgen Receptor: In Silico Approaches to Identify Agonist Compounds.
Réau M; Lagarde N; Zagury JF; Montes M
Cells; 2019 Nov; 8(11):. PubMed ID: 31766271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Profile-QSAR: a novel meta-QSAR method that combines activities across the kinase family to accurately predict affinity, selectivity, and cellular activity.
Martin E; Mukherjee P; Sullivan D; Jansen J
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1942-56. PubMed ID: 21667971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integrating high-throughput exposure assessment and in vitro screening data to prioritize endocrine-active potential and dietary risks of pesticides and veterinary drug residues in animal products.
Luo YS; Chiu ZY; Wu KY; Hsu CC
Food Chem Toxicol; 2023 Mar; 173():113639. PubMed ID: 36708863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In silico exploration of c-KIT inhibitors by pharmaco-informatics methodology: pharmacophore modeling, 3D QSAR, docking studies, and virtual screening.
Chaudhari P; Bari S
Mol Divers; 2016 Feb; 20(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 26416560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utilizing High-Throughput Screening Data, Integrative Toxicological Prioritization Index Score, and Exposure-Activity Ratios for Chemical Prioritization: A Case Study of Endocrine-Active Pesticides in Food Crops.
Luo YS; Wu TH
J Agric Food Chem; 2021 Sep; 69(38):11427-11439. PubMed ID: 34524809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using Molecular Initiating Events to Develop a Structural Alert Based Screening Workflow for Nuclear Receptor Ligands Associated with Hepatic Steatosis.
Mellor CL; Steinmetz FP; Cronin MT
Chem Res Toxicol; 2016 Feb; 29(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 26787004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A high-throughput, computational system to predict if environmental contaminants can bind to human nuclear receptors.
Wang X; Zhang X; Xia P; Zhang J; Wang Y; Zhang R; Giesy JP; Shi W; Yu H
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jan; 576():609-616. PubMed ID: 27810749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Binary classification of a large collection of environmental chemicals from estrogen receptor assays by quantitative structure-activity relationship and machine learning methods.
Zang Q; Rotroff DM; Judson RS
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Dec; 53(12):3244-61. PubMed ID: 24279462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computational evaluation of endocrine activity of biocidal active substances.
Stanojević M; Vračko Grobelšek M; Sollner Dolenc M
Chemosphere; 2021 Mar; 267():129284. PubMed ID: 33338726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In silico identification and pharmacological evaluation of novel endocrine disrupting chemicals that act via the ligand-binding domain of the estrogen receptor α.
McRobb FM; Kufareva I; Abagyan R
Toxicol Sci; 2014 Sep; 141(1):188-97. PubMed ID: 24928891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
