These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36176477)

  • 1. Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes for Upper and Lower Ureteral Stones in Non-obese and Non-Pre-stented Adults: Is One Session Sufficient?
    Alsmadi JK
    Cureus; 2022 Sep; 14(9):e29592. PubMed ID: 36176477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study.
    Sevim M; Alkis O; Kartal İG; Kazan HO; Sonmez OY; Korkmaz M; Aras B
    Cent European J Urol; 2023; 76(3):227-232. PubMed ID: 38045786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finding the optimal candidate for shock wave lithotripsy: external validation and comparison of five prediction models.
    Popiolek M; Jendeberg J; Sundqvist P; Wagenius M; Lidén M
    Urolithiasis; 2023 Apr; 51(1):66. PubMed ID: 37027057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Erector spinae plane block prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy decreases fluoroscopy time and promise a comfortable procedure for renal stones: A prospective randomized study.
    Karaaslan M; Olcucuoglu E; Kurtbeyoglu S; Tonyali S; Yilmaz M; Odabas O
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2023 Nov; 47(9):566-572. PubMed ID: 37084807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shock wave lithotripsy in the era of COVID-19.
    Ibrahim RM; Elzawy F; Ragheb AM; Elmarakbi AA; Sayed O; Lotfy AM; Youssef A; Badwy HF; Mohamed AG
    Urol Ann; 2024; 16(1):104-107. PubMed ID: 38415230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting Stone-free Status based on Quadruple-D and Triple-D Scores after Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Lithotripsy and Comparing With Broad-Spectrum Population.
    Coşkun A; Can U
    Aktuelle Urol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38479426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors that affect outcome of pediatric shock waves lithotripsy with sedoanalgesia.
    Abid AF; Hussein NS; Mahdi BA
    Urol Ann; 2019; 11(1):72-76. PubMed ID: 30787575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of Noncontrast Computed Tomography Parameters in Predicting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Upper Urinary Stones Cases: A Meta-analysis.
    Owen K; Joe W; Ivander A; Palgunadi IN; Adhyatma KP
    Acad Radiol; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37985292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In Vitro Assessment of Three Clinical Lithotripters Employing Different Shock Wave Generators.
    Faragher SR; Cleveland RO; Kumar S; Wiseman OJ; Turney BW
    J Endourol; 2016 May; 30(5):560-5. PubMed ID: 26918374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of life after urinary stone surgery based on Japanese Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life questionnaire: multicenter analysis from SMART study group.
    Okada T; Hamamoto S; Taguchi K; Okada S; Inoue T; Ando R; Okada A; Yasui T;
    Urolithiasis; 2023 Sep; 51(1):113. PubMed ID: 37707652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting shockwave lithotripsy outcome for urolithiasis using clinical and stone computed tomography texture analysis variables.
    Cui HW; Silva MD; Mills AW; North BV; Turney BW
    Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):14674. PubMed ID: 31604986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of ureteric stent on outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A propensity score analysis.
    Kaczmarek K; Gołąb A; Słojewski M
    Cent European J Urol; 2016; 69(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 27551556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: An opinion on its future.
    Rassweiler J; Rassweiler MC; Frede T; Alken P
    Indian J Urol; 2014 Jan; 30(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 24497687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Helical CT to Predict Stone Fragility in Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL).
    Williams JC; Zarse CA; Jackson ME; Lingeman JE; McAteer JA
    AIP Conf Proc; 2007; 900():326-339. PubMed ID: 29749979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. OBESITY: A DELICATE ISSUE CHOOSING THE ESWL TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH KIDNEY AND URETERAL STONES?
    Pricop C; Radavoi GD; Puia D; Vechiu C; Jinga V
    Acta Endocrinol (Buchar); 2019; -5(1):133-138. PubMed ID: 31149074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Percutaneous antegrade management of large proximal ureteral stones using non-papillary puncture.
    Tsaturyan A; Peteinaris A; Adamou C; Pagonis K; Musheghyan L; Natsos A; Vrettos T; Liatsikos E; Kallidonis P
    Asian J Urol; 2024 Jan; 11(1):110-114. PubMed ID: 38312817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A giant ureteral stone in a 32-year-old man: a case report.
    Natami M; Makarem A; Ahmed F; Dastgheib N; Zahraei AH
    Int Med Case Rep J; 2019; 12():43-46. PubMed ID: 30858733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How has the COVID-19 pandemic changed treatment preferences of patients with proximal ureteral stones?
    Yildiz AK; Varan A; Kurt H; Doluoglu OG; Ozgur BC
    Curr Urol; 2024 Mar; 18(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 38505151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of stone characteristics on cavitation in burst wave lithotripsy.
    Hunter C; Cunitz B; Dunmire B; Bailey M; Randad A; Kreider W; Maxwell AD; Sorensen MD; Williams JC
    Proc Meet Acoust; 2018 Nov; 35(1):. PubMed ID: 32612739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unusual complication after shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for a renal stone: A subcapsular hepatic hematoma. A case report and review of literature.
    Fentoukh MK; Alqahtani AA; Salih AA; Koko AH
    Urol Case Rep; 2023 Nov; 51():102604. PubMed ID: 38024509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.