156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36178033)
1. Comparing spatial conservation prioritization methods with site- versus spatial dependency-based connectivity.
Muenzel D; Critchell K; Cox C; Campbell SJ; Jakub R; Chollett I; Krueck N; Holstein D; Treml EA; Beger M
Conserv Biol; 2023 Apr; 37(2):e14008. PubMed ID: 36178033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integrating larval connectivity into the marine conservation decision-making process across spatial scales.
Muenzel D; Critchell K; Cox C; Campbell SJ; Jakub R; Suherfian W; Sara L; Chollett I; Treml EA; Beger M
Conserv Biol; 2023 Jun; 37(3):e14038. PubMed ID: 36478610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial, socio-economic, and ecological implications of incorporating minimum size constraints in marine protected area network design.
Metcalfe K; Vaughan G; Vaz S; Smith RJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1615-25. PubMed ID: 26219669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Designing connected marine reserves in the face of global warming.
Álvarez-Romero JG; Munguía-Vega A; Beger M; Del Mar Mancha-Cisneros M; Suárez-Castillo AN; Gurney GG; Pressey RL; Gerber LR; Morzaria-Luna HN; Reyes-Bonilla H; Adams VM; Kolb M; Graham EM; VanDerWal J; Castillo-López A; Hinojosa-Arango G; Petatán-Ramírez D; Moreno-Baez M; Godínez-Reyes CR; Torre J
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Feb; 24(2):e671-e691. PubMed ID: 29274104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system.
Roberts KE; Cook CN; Beher J; Treml EA
Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):699-710. PubMed ID: 32623761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Larval dispersal and movement patterns of coral reef fishes, and implications for marine reserve network design.
Green AL; Maypa AP; Almany GR; Rhodes KL; Weeks R; Abesamis RA; Gleason MG; Mumby PJ; White AT
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2015 Nov; 90(4):1215-47. PubMed ID: 25423947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incorporating larval dispersal into MPA design for both conservation and fisheries.
Krueck NC; Ahmadia GN; Green A; Jones GP; Possingham HP; Riginos C; Treml EA; Mumby PJ
Ecol Appl; 2017 Apr; 27(3):925-941. PubMed ID: 28039952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficient and equitable design of marine protected areas in Fiji through inclusion of stakeholder-specific objectives in conservation planning.
Gurney GG; Pressey RL; Ban NC; Álvarez-Romero JG; Jupiter S; Adams VM
Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1378-89. PubMed ID: 25916976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of planning for connectivity on linear reserve networks.
Lentini PE; Gibbons P; Carwardine J; Fischer J; Drielsma M; Martin TG
Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):796-807. PubMed ID: 23647073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of dispersal patterns on marine reserves: does the tail wag the dog?
Lockwood DR; Hastings A; Botsford LW
Theor Popul Biol; 2002 May; 61(3):297-309. PubMed ID: 12027616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marine reserves stabilize fish populations and fisheries yields in disturbed coral reef systems.
Hopf JK; Jones GP; Williamson DH; Connolly SR
Ecol Appl; 2019 Jul; 29(5):e01905. PubMed ID: 30985954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reserve design to optimize functional connectivity and animal density.
Gupta A; Dilkina B; Morin DJ; Fuller AK; Royle JA; Sutherland C; Gomes CP
Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):1023-1034. PubMed ID: 31209924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dispersal patterns of coastal fish: implications for designing networks of marine protected areas.
Di Franco A; Gillanders BM; De Benedetto G; Pennetta A; De Leo GA; Guidetti P
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31681. PubMed ID: 22355388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Software for prioritizing conservation actions based on probabilistic information.
Watts M; Klein CJ; Tulloch VJD; Carvalho SB; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1299-1308. PubMed ID: 33305882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of seascape connectivity on reserve performance along exposed coastlines.
Ortodossi NL; Gilby BL; Schlacher TA; Connolly RM; Yabsley NA; Henderson CJ; Olds AD
Conserv Biol; 2019 Jun; 33(3):580-589. PubMed ID: 30318640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Forecasting the influence of conservation strategies on landscape connectivity.
Mozelewski TG; Robbins ZJ; Scheller RM
Conserv Biol; 2022 Oct; 36(5):e13904. PubMed ID: 35212035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using individual-based movement information to identify spatial conservation priorities for mobile species.
Dwyer RG; Campbell HA; Pillans RD; Watts ME; Lyon BJ; Guru SM; Dinh MN; Possingham HP; Franklin CE
Conserv Biol; 2019 Dec; 33(6):1426-1437. PubMed ID: 30963642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Local connections and the larval competency strongly influence marine metapopulation persistence.
Cecino G; Treml EA
Ecol Appl; 2021 Jun; 31(4):e02302. PubMed ID: 33565673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marine reserve design theory for species with ontogenetic migration.
White JW
Biol Lett; 2015 Jan; 11(1):20140511. PubMed ID: 25631225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Planning Marine Reserve Networks for Both Feature Representation and Demographic Persistence Using Connectivity Patterns.
Bode M; Williamson DH; Weeks R; Jones GP; Almany GR; Harrison HB; Hopf JK; Pressey RL
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154272. PubMed ID: 27168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
