175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3617849)
1. [Ideal experimental microsurgical methods in vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy].
Drawz B; Drawz G; Putzke HP; Baasner R
Z Exp Chir Transplant Kunstliche Organe; 1987; 20(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 3617849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patency following microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy: temporal considerations.
Matthews GJ; Schlegel PN; Goldstein M
J Urol; 1995 Dec; 154(6):2070-3. PubMed ID: 7500460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Factors affecting the results of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy].
Peng J; Yuan YM; Zhang ZC; Gao B; Song WD; Xin ZC; Guo YL; Jin J
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Aug; 43(4):562-4. PubMed ID: 21844967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fibrin-glue assisted vasoepididymostomy: a comparison to standard end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy in the rat model.
Shekarriz BM; Thomas AJ; Sabanegh E; Kononov A; Levin HS
J Urol; 1997 Oct; 158(4):1602-5. PubMed ID: 9302182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [New microsurgical methods for vasoepididymostomy].
Drawz G; Drawz B; Heise H; Putzke HP; Baasner R
Urol Int; 1985; 40(6):337-42. PubMed ID: 4090106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats.
McCallum S; Li PS; Sheynkin Y; Su LM; Chan P; Goldstein M
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2284-8. PubMed ID: 11956494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of the epididymal tubule during an end-to-side vasoepididymostomy.
Marmar JL
J Urol; 1995 Jul; 154(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 7776465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vasoepididymostomy to the head of the epididymis: a comparative study of two microsurgical techniques in the rabbit.
Vancaillie T; Gordts S; Boeckx W; Vasquez G; Brosens I
Acta Eur Fertil; 1984; 15(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 6730862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Microsurgical treatment of obstructive azoospermia: a report of 76 cases].
Zhang FB; Liang ZY; Li LJ; Li JP; Wu JG; Jin F; Tian YH
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Mar; 21(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 25898556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Microsurgical attachments for vasovaso- and vasoepididymostomy in animal experiments].
Drawz G; Drawz B; Templin R; Erdmann T; Baasner R; Putzke HP
Z Urol Nephrol; 1983 Jan; 76(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 6342298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Experience with microsurgical epididymovasostomy (specific tubule technic: end-to-end anastomosis by the Silber method)].
Nishimura K; Matsuda M; Nonomura M; Takeuchi H; Okada K; Yoshida O
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1986 Jul; 32(7):1013-8. PubMed ID: 3776762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obstructive azoospermia of unknown origin: sites of obstruction and surgical outcomes.
Matsuda T; Horii Y; Yoshida O
J Urol; 1994 Jun; 151(6):1543-6. PubMed ID: 8189567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study in a rat model.
Schiff J; Li PS; Goldstein M
J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1720-5. PubMed ID: 15017273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a comparison between the end-to-side anastomosis and the invagination technique.
Shekarriz M; Pomer S
Urol Res; 1991; 19(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 1949427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vasectomy reversal.
Belker AM
Urol Clin North Am; 1987 Feb; 14(1):155-66. PubMed ID: 3811050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Re: Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats.
Shekarriz B; Pomer S
J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):294. PubMed ID: 12478173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Microsurgical epididymovasostomy by tubule intussusception: a new technique in rat model.
Stefanovic KB; Clark SA; Buncke HJ
Fertil Steril; 1991 Jan; 55(1):189-93. PubMed ID: 1986959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study of 3 intussusception techniques in rats.
Chan PT; Li PS; Goldstein M
J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1924-9. PubMed ID: 12686875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Invagination vasoepididymoanastomosis with application of microsurgical tools].
Makushin DG; Poluéktov VL
Urologiia; 2006; (3):79-80, 82-3. PubMed ID: 16889099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Re: Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study of 3 intussusception techniques in rats.
Kumar R
J Urol; 2004 Feb; 171(2 Pt 1):810-1. PubMed ID: 14713830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
