These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36179475)

  • 1. The distributional effects of China'senvironmental taxation: A multi-regional analysis.
    Chen Z; Zhang R; Wang F; Xia F; Liu B; Zhang B
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Dec; 324():116276. PubMed ID: 36179475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF A NATIONAL CO
    Caron J; Cole J; Goettle R; Onda C; McFarland J; Woollacott J
    Clim Chang Econ (Singap); 2018 Feb; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 31798815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [VOCs tax policy on China's economy development].
    Liu CX; Wang YF; Wang HL; Hao ZP; Wang Z
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2011 Dec; 32(12):3509-14. PubMed ID: 22468510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental taxation and regional inequality in China.
    Wang J; Lin J; Feng K; Liu P; Du M; Ni R; Chen L; Kong H; Weng H; Liu M; Baiocchi G; Zhao Y; Mi Z; Cao J; Hubacek K
    Sci Bull (Beijing); 2019 Nov; 64(22):1691-1699. PubMed ID: 36659783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Who pays the most cigarette tax in Turkey.
    Önder Z; Yürekli AA
    Tob Control; 2016 Jan; 25(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 25228361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distributional effects of climate change taxation: the case of the UK.
    Feng K; Hubacek K; Guan D; Contestabile M; Minx J; Barrett J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(10):3670-6. PubMed ID: 20429551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How would the carbon tax on energy commodities affect consumer welfare? Evidence from China's household energy consumption system.
    Liu J; Gong N; Qin J
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Sep; 317():115466. PubMed ID: 35751267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The consequences of tobacco tax on household health and finances in rich and poor smokers in China: an extended cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Verguet S; Gauvreau CL; Mishra S; MacLennan M; Murphy SM; Brouwer ED; Nugent RA; Zhao K; Jha P; Jamison DT
    Lancet Glob Health; 2015 Apr; 3(4):e206-16. PubMed ID: 25772692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Study on China's Tobacco Taxation and Its Influencing Factor on Economic Growth.
    Zhao S
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():832040. PubMed ID: 35282251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The optimal choice of environmental tax revenue usage: Incentives for cleaner production or end-of-pipe treatment?
    Liu B; Ge J
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Mar; 329():117106. PubMed ID: 36566734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Economic benefits of construction waste recycling enterprises under tax incentive policies.
    Liu J; Gong E; Wang X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(9):12574-12588. PubMed ID: 33856632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The environmental cost of tax administration: evidence from a regression discontinuity design in China.
    Huang B; Tan G; Xiao R; Li J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(4):11046-11064. PubMed ID: 36087180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Questioning the regressivity of tobacco taxes: a distributional accounting impact model of increased tobacco taxation.
    Verguet S; Kearns PKA; Rees VW
    Tob Control; 2021 May; 30(3):245-257. PubMed ID: 32576701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The efficiency of a volumetric alcohol tax in Australia.
    Byrnes J; Petrie DJ; Doran CM; Shakeshaft A
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2012 Jan; 10(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 22181353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of tax policy changes in Montenegro: smoking behaviour by socio-economic status.
    Cizmovic M; Mugosa A; Kovacevic M; Lakovic T
    Tob Control; 2022 Sep; 31(Suppl 2):s124-s132. PubMed ID: 35279643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjusting export tax rebates to reduce the environmental impacts of trade: Lessons from China.
    Song P; Mao X; Corsetti G
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Sep; 161():408-416. PubMed ID: 26210774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to Promote Low-Carbon Economic Development? A Comprehensive Assessment of Carbon Tax Policy in China.
    Liu W; Li Y; Liu T; Liu M; Wei H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(20):. PubMed ID: 34682445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Price elasticity of tobacco products among economic classes in India, 2011-2012.
    Selvaraj S; Srivastava S; Karan A
    BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e008180. PubMed ID: 26656009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distributional health and financial benefits of increased tobacco taxes in Colombia: results from a modelling study.
    James EK; Saxena A; Franco Restrepo C; Llorente B; Vecino-Ortiz AI; Villar Uribe M; Iunes RF; Verguet S
    Tob Control; 2019 Jul; 28(4):374-380. PubMed ID: 30093415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Price and income elasticity of cigarette demand in Bosnia and Herzegovina by different socioeconomic groups.
    Gligorić D; Preradović Kulovac D; Mićić L; Pepić A
    Tob Control; 2022 Sep; 31(Suppl 2):s101-s109. PubMed ID: 35078908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.