158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36180262)
1. Comparative analysis of intaglio surface trueness of cement-retained implant-supported prostheses generated by a cast-free digital workflow and a three-dimensionally printed cast workflow.
Hwang JY; Yoon HI
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):272.e1-272.e7. PubMed ID: 36180262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.
Abdeen L; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital workflow: In vitro accuracy of 3D printed casts generated from complete-arch digital implant scans.
Papaspyridakos P; Chen YW; Alshawaf B; Kang K; Finkelman M; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):589-593. PubMed ID: 31959396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intaglio surface trueness of dentures bases fabricated with 3D printing vs. conventional workflow: a clinical study.
Faur AB; Rotar RN; Jivănescu A
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):671. PubMed ID: 38851680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of manufacturing technologies on the surface accuracy of CAD-CAM occlusal splints.
Orgev A; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):697-705. PubMed ID: 36227731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intaglio surface trueness of milled and 3D-printed digital maxillary and mandibular dentures: A clinical study.
Lo Russo L; Guida L; Zhurakivska K; Troiano G; Chochlidakis K; Ercoli C
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):131-139. PubMed ID: 34116839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of digitally fabricated drilling guide to form screw-access channels in cement-retained implant prostheses: A randomized clinical trial.
Bae S; Mai HN; Lee DH
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1282.e1-1282.e8. PubMed ID: 36123185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Crown Accuracy and Time Efficiency of Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations in a Complete Digital Workflow: A Randomized Control Trial.
Ren S; Jiang X; Lin Y; Di P
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):405-411. PubMed ID: 34748653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Trueness of Obturator Prosthesis Base Manufactured by Conventional and 3D Printing Techniques.
Alfaraj A; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 34048118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reverse scan body: The scan pattern affects the fit of complete-arch prototype prostheses.
Papaspyridakos P; Bedrossian EA; Ntovas P; Kudara Y; Bokhary A; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):186-191. PubMed ID: 37721306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of intaglio surface trueness and margin quality of interim crowns in accordance with the build angle of stereolithography apparatus 3-dimensional printing.
Yu BY; Son K; Lee KB
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 32807402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used.
Yeager B; Çakmak G; Zheng F; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36690552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness.
Kalberer N; Mehl A; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):637-643. PubMed ID: 30711292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts.
Jang Y; Sim JY; Park JK; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 31027960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of 3D Printed Implant Casts Versus Stone Casts: A Comparative Study in the Anterior Maxilla.
Banjar A; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 33474754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complete Digital Workflow for Prosthesis Prototype Fabrication with Double Digital Scanning: Accuracy of Fit Assessment.
Papaspyridakos P; AlFulaij F; Bokhary A; Sallustio A; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 35176178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trueness of 3-dimensionally printed complete arch implant analog casts.
Gagnon-Audet A; An H; Jensen UF; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37558526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
