These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36181126)

  • 1. Usefulness of preoperative Short Form-36 Mental Component Score as a prognostic factor in patients who underwent decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ko S; Choi W
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Sep; 101(39):e30231. PubMed ID: 36181126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlations Between the SF-36, the Oswestry-Disability Index and Rolland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Decompression According to Types of Spine Origin Pain.
    Ko S; Chae S
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):E804-E808. PubMed ID: 27662270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Construct validity and responsiveness of commonly used patient reported outcome instruments in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Vishwanathan K; Braithwaite I
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2021 May; 16():125-131. PubMed ID: 33717946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():105966. PubMed ID: 32485521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Presenting Mental Health Influences Postoperative Clinical Trajectory and Long-Term Patient Satisfaction After Lumbar Decompression.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e649-e661. PubMed ID: 35577207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
    den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direction and Severity of Root Compression Affects the Clinical Outcome After Decompression?: Correlation Between Radiologic Grading and Postoperative Prognosis in Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis.
    Ko S; Lee H; Chae S; Choi W; Lee S
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Oct; 33(8):E415-E419. PubMed ID: 32310831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Objective functional assessment using the "Timed Up and Go" test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Stienen MN; Maldaner N; Joswig H; Corniola MV; Bellut D; Prömmel P; Regli L; Weyerbrock A; Schaller K; Gautschi OP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E4. PubMed ID: 31042663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term outcomes after revision neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the effectiveness of surgery.
    Mendenhall SK; Parker SL; Adogwa O; Shau DN; Cheng J; Aaronson O; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Oct; 27(7):353-7. PubMed ID: 25247253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are preoperative health-related quality of life scores predictive of clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion?
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Johnson JR; Puno RM; Campbell MJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):725-30. PubMed ID: 19333106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of Preoperative 12-Item Short Form Mental Composite Score on Clinical Outcomes in an Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Population Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Patel MR; Jacob KC; Patel SD; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Feb; 158():e1022-e1030. PubMed ID: 34906755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pain Relief After Selective Nerve Root Block as a Predictor of Postoperative Functional Outcome in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Undergoing Decompressive Surgery.
    Ko S; Jun C; Min WK; Son E; Lee S; Lee GW; Yoo H;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 May; 47(9):666-671. PubMed ID: 34468438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral laminotomy or total laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-institution experience.
    Pietrantonio A; Trungu S; Famà I; Forcato S; Miscusi M; Raco A
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E2. PubMed ID: 31042648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of mental health with physical function, pain, and disability following anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Hartman TJ; Nie JW; MacGregor KR; Oyetayo OO; Zheng E; Singh K
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Feb; 165(2):341-349. PubMed ID: 36629953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis.
    Ghogawala Z; Benzel EC; Amin-Hanjani S; Barker FG; Harrington JF; Magge SN; Strugar J; Coumans JV; Borges LF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Oct; 1(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 15478364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.