BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3618185)

  • 1. Auditory brainstem response in the cat. Effect of masking level on derived-band contributions.
    Mair IW; Laukli E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1987; 103(5-6):586-92. PubMed ID: 3618185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem responses in the cat.
    Mair IW; Laukli E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1985; 99(3-4):377-83. PubMed ID: 4013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip.
    Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An alternative diagnostic test for active Ménière's disease and cochlear hydrops using high-pass noise masked responses: the complex amplitude ratio.
    Don M; Kwong B; Tanaka C
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(6):359-70. PubMed ID: 17664867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early auditory-evoked responses in the cat: rate effects.
    Mair IW; Elverland HH; Laukli E
    Audiology; 1979; 18(4):265-78. PubMed ID: 475661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Rapid derived auditory evoked potentials].
    Conraux C; Dauman R; Feblot P
    Audiology; 1981; 20(5):382-93. PubMed ID: 7271591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. II. Frequency specificity.
    Burkard R; Hecox K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1214-23. PubMed ID: 6643844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency specificity and on-effect in brainstem electric response audiometry.
    Debruyne F
    J Otolaryngol; 1982 Aug; 11(4):267-70. PubMed ID: 7131639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory-evoked response in the clinically normal dog: early latency components.
    Sims MH; Moore RE
    Am J Vet Res; 1984 Oct; 45(10):2019-27. PubMed ID: 6497099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Onset-offset effects of the human brainstem auditory-evoked response.
    Elfner LF; Barnes AR
    J Aud Res; 1983 Apr; 23(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 6679545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brain stem auditory potentials evoked by clicks in the presence of high-pass filtered noise in dogs.
    Poncelet L; Deltenre P; Coppens A; Michaux C; Coussart E
    Res Vet Sci; 2006 Apr; 80(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 16002109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surface-recorded auditory brainstem responses in the dog.
    Barry SJ; Barry SD
    J Aud Res; 1980 Oct; 20(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 7349303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of xylazine and ketamine on the acoustic reflex and brain stem auditory-evoked response in the cat.
    Sims MH; Horohov JE
    Am J Vet Res; 1986 Jan; 47(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 3946886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the dual structure of the auditory brainstem response in dogs.
    Wilson WJ; Bailey KL; Balke CL; D'Arbe CL; Hoddinott BR; Bradley AP; Mills PC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Oct; 117(10):2211-20. PubMed ID: 16893679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brain stem auditory-evoked response of the nonanesthetized dog.
    Marshall AE
    Am J Vet Res; 1985 Apr; 46(4):966-73. PubMed ID: 4014849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem responses. A derived-band study.
    Laukli E; Mair IW
    Scand Audiol; 1986; 15(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 3797980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory brain stem responses (ABR) in cat. Latency as a function of stimulus polarity, intensity and acoustic waveform.
    Tvete O; Haugsten P
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981; 13():35-8. PubMed ID: 6944776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [ABR short latency negative responses in neonates].
    Zagólski O
    Przegl Lek; 2005; 62(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 16053214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical considerations in the interpretation of auditory brainstem response audiometry.
    Jacobson JT; Novotny GM; Elliott S
    J Otolaryngol; 1980 Dec; 9(6):493-504. PubMed ID: 7206036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Portions of tone pips contributing to frequency-selective auditory brain stem responses.
    Kodera K; Marsh RR; Suzuki M; Suzuki J
    Audiology; 1983; 22(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 6870663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.