These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36182305)

  • 1. Auditory spatial analysis in reverberant multi-talker environments with congruent and incongruent audio-visual room information.
    Ahrens A; Lund KD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Sep; 152(3):1586. PubMed ID: 36182305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Method for Assessing Auditory Spatial Analysis in Reverberant Multitalker Environments.
    Weller T; Best V; Buchholz JM; Young T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jul; 27(7):601-11. PubMed ID: 27406665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic scene complexity affects motion behavior during speech perception in audio-visual multi-talker virtual environments.
    Slomianka V; Dau T; Ahrens A
    Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):19028. PubMed ID: 39152193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Looking Behavior and Audiovisual Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Lewis DE; Smith NA; Spalding JL; Valente DL
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):783-794. PubMed ID: 29252979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noise-robust cortical tracking of attended speech in real-world acoustic scenes.
    Fuglsang SA; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():435-444. PubMed ID: 28412441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of room acoustics and visual cues on speech perception and talker localization by children with mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss.
    Lewis D; Al-Salim S; McDermott T; Dergan A; McCreery RW
    Front Pediatr; 2023; 11():1252452. PubMed ID: 38078311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of noise, reverberation and foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' performance of English speech comprehension.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2772. PubMed ID: 27250170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of talker continuity and speech rate on auditory working memory.
    Lim SJ; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1167-1177. PubMed ID: 30737757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual Speech Benefit in Clear and Degraded Speech Depends on the Auditory Intelligibility of the Talker and the Number of Background Talkers.
    Blackburn CL; Kitterick PT; Jones G; Sumner CJ; Stacey PC
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519837866. PubMed ID: 30909814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual learning of multiple talkers: Determinants, characteristics, and limitations.
    Cummings SN; Theodore RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2335-2359. PubMed ID: 36076119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited.
    Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Audio and visual cues in a two-talker divided attention speech-monitoring task.
    Brungart DS; Kordik AJ; Simpson BD
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(3):562-73. PubMed ID: 16435697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Spatial Speech Presentation on Listener Response Strategy for Talker-Identification.
    Uhrig S; Perkis A; Möller S; Svensson UP; Behne DM
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():730744. PubMed ID: 35153653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Hearing Aid Noise Reduction on Early and Late Cortical Representations of Competing Talkers in Noise.
    Alickovic E; Ng EHN; Fiedler L; Santurette S; Innes-Brown H; Graversen C
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():636060. PubMed ID: 33841081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EEG activity evoked in preparation for multi-talker listening by adults and children.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():83-100. PubMed ID: 27178442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implicit Talker Training Improves Comprehension of Auditory Speech in Noise.
    Kreitewolf J; Mathias SR; von Kriegstein K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1584. PubMed ID: 28959226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.