These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36183147)

  • 1. Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners.
    Monson KL; Smith ED; Peters EM
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jan; 68(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 36183147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeatability and reproducibility of comparison decisions by firearms examiners.
    Monson KL; Smith ED; Peters EM
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Sep; 68(5):1721-1740. PubMed ID: 37393551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Planning, design and logistics of a decision analysis study: The FBI/Ames study involving forensic firearms examiners.
    Monson KL; Smith ED; Bajic SJ
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 4():100221. PubMed ID: 35243285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study of examiner accuracy in cartridge case comparisons. Part 1: Examiner error rates.
    Baldwin DP; Bajic SJ; Morris MD; Zamzow DS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Aug; 349():111733. PubMed ID: 37257388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study of examiner accuracy in cartridge case comparisons. Part 2: Examiner use of the AFTE range of conclusions.
    Baldwin DP; Bajic SJ; Morris MD; Zamzow DS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Aug; 349():111739. PubMed ID: 37257389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examination of the possibility to use Siamese networks for the comparison of firing pin marks.
    Giverts P; Sorokina K; Fedorenko V
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Nov; 67(6):2416-2424. PubMed ID: 36149037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visualisation by confocal microscopy of traces on bullets and cartridge cases.
    Bonfanti MS; Ghauharali RI
    Sci Justice; 2000; 40(4):241-56. PubMed ID: 11094821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating firearm examiner conclusion variability using cartridge case reproductions.
    Law EF; Morris KB
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1704-1720. PubMed ID: 34057735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of manufacturing processes on the identification of bullets and cartridge cases--a review of the literature.
    Bonfanti MS; de Kinder J
    Sci Justice; 1999; 39(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 10750267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inconclusives, errors, and error rates in forensic firearms analysis:Three statistical perspectives.
    Dorfman AH; Valliant R
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 5():100273. PubMed ID: 35800204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of forensic footwear examiner decisions.
    Austin Hicklin R; McVicker BC; Parks C; LeMay J; Richetelli N; Smith M; Buscaglia J; Perlman RS; Peters EM; Eckenrode BA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Oct; 339():111418. PubMed ID: 35987091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image matching algorithms for breech face marks and firing pins in a database of spent cartridge cases of firearms.
    Geradts ZJ; Bijhold J; Hermsen R; Murtagh F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2001 Jun; 119(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 11348799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The false promise of firearms examination validation studies: Lay controls, simplistic comparisons, and the failure to soundly measure misidentification rates.
    Gutierrez RE; Prokesch EJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jul; 69(4):1334-1349. PubMed ID: 38684627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Worldwide Study of Bullets Fired From 10 Consecutively Rifled 9MM RUGER Pistol Barrels-Analysis of Examiner Error Rate.
    Hamby JE; Brundage DJ; Petraco NDK; Thorpe JW
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):551-557. PubMed ID: 30261099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing the accuracy and reliability of palmar friction ridge comparisons - A black box study.
    Eldridge H; De Donno M; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110457. PubMed ID: 33239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blind testing in firearms: Preliminary results from a blind quality control program.
    Neuman M; Hundl C; Grimaldi A; Eudaley D; Stein D; Stout P
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):964-974. PubMed ID: 35349174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Validation Study of Bullet and Cartridge Case Comparisons Using Samples Representative of Actual Casework.
    Smith TP; Andrew Smith G; Snipes JB
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jul; 61(4):939-46. PubMed ID: 27135174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of ordinal outcomes in forensic black-box studies.
    Arora HM; Kaplan-Damary N; Stern HS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jan; 354():111909. PubMed ID: 38104395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of the discriminating power of an Integrated Ballistics Identification System
    Morris KB; Law EF; Jefferys RL; Dearth EC; Fabyanic EB
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Nov; 280():188-193. PubMed ID: 29078161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Bayesian approach for the analysis of error rate studies in forensic science.
    Hendricks JH; Neumann C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 306():110047. PubMed ID: 31821943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.