These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36183424)

  • 21. On the use of in-silico simulations to support experimental design: A case study in microbial inactivation of foods.
    Garre A; Peñalver-Soto JL; Esnoz A; Iguaz A; Fernandez PS; Egea JA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220683. PubMed ID: 31454353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo risk analysis, and Bayesian uncertainty assessment.
    Greenland S
    Risk Anal; 2001 Aug; 21(4):579-83. PubMed ID: 11726013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Graphical models and Bayesian domains in risk modelling: application in microbiological risk assessment.
    Greiner M; Smid J; Havelaar AH; Müller-Graf C
    Prev Vet Med; 2013 May; 110(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 23482086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modeling strain variability in Campylobacter jejuni thermal inactivation by quantifying the number of strains required.
    Abe H; Kawasaki S
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2024 Apr; 414():110618. PubMed ID: 38340547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantifying and reducing uncertainty in life cycle assessment using the Bayesian Monte Carlo method.
    Lo SC; Ma HW; Lo SL
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Mar; 340(1-3):23-33. PubMed ID: 15752490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Combining QMRA and Epidemiology to Estimate Campylobacteriosis Incidence.
    Evers EG; Bouwknegt M
    Risk Anal; 2016 Oct; 36(10):1959-1968. PubMed ID: 26889674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Strain variability of foodborne pathogens in microbiological risk assessment - a review].
    Tian S; Wang X; Li H; Bai L; Liu H; Zhang X; Dong Q
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2020 Nov; 36(11):2334-2344. PubMed ID: 33244928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Inferring an augmented Bayesian network to confront a complex quantitative microbial risk assessment model with durability studies: application to Bacillus cereus on a courgette purée production chain.
    Rigaux C; Ancelet S; Carlin F; Nguyen-thé C; Albert I
    Risk Anal; 2013 May; 33(5):877-92. PubMed ID: 22967223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. To pool or not to pool: That is the question in microbial kinetics.
    van Boekel MAJS
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2021 Sep; 354():109283. PubMed ID: 34140188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sensitivity analysis of a two-dimensional quantitative microbiological risk assessment: keeping variability and uncertainty separated.
    Busschaert P; Geeraerd AH; Uyttendaele M; Van Impe JF
    Risk Anal; 2011 Aug; 31(8):1295-307. PubMed ID: 21418082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bayesian calibration of hyperelastic constitutive models of soft tissue.
    Madireddy S; Sista B; Vemaganti K
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jun; 59():108-127. PubMed ID: 26751706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multilevel and Quasi Monte Carlo Methods for the Calculation of the Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information.
    Fang W; Wang Z; Giles MB; Jackson CH; Welton NJ; Andrieu C; Thom H
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Feb; 42(2):168-181. PubMed ID: 34231446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A tutorial on uncertainty propagation techniques for predictive microbiology models: A critical analysis of state-of-the-art techniques.
    Akkermans S; Nimmegeers P; Van Impe JF
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 282():1-8. PubMed ID: 29885972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment: risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons.
    Birot S; Crépet A; Remington BC; Madsen CB; Kruizinga AG; Baumert JL; Brockhoff PB
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):18206. PubMed ID: 31796875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Model Uncertainty and Bayesian Model Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Data.
    Shao K; Gift JS
    Risk Anal; 2014 Jan; 34(1):101-20. PubMed ID: 23758102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microbial variability in growth and heat resistance of a pathogen and a spoiler: All variabilities are equal but some are more equal than others.
    den Besten HM; Aryani DC; Metselaar KI; Zwietering MH
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 240():24-31. PubMed ID: 27207811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Uncertainty reduction in biochemical kinetic models: Enforcing desired model properties.
    Miskovic L; Béal J; Moret M; Hatzimanikatis V
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Aug; 15(8):e1007242. PubMed ID: 31430276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tail or artefact? Illustration of the impact that uncertainty of the serial dilution and cell enumeration methods has on microbial inactivation.
    Garre A; Egea JA; Esnoz A; Palop A; Fernandez PS
    Food Res Int; 2019 May; 119():76-83. PubMed ID: 30884713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of procedure classification on process variability and parameter uncertainty of surgical case durations.
    Dexter F; Dexter EU; Ledolter J
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Apr; 110(4):1155-63. PubMed ID: 20357155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data.
    Van Oijen M; Rougier J; Smith R
    Tree Physiol; 2005 Jul; 25(7):915-27. PubMed ID: 15870058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.