These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36184310)

  • 1. A comparison of different methods and materials for establishing maximal intercuspal position: A clinical study.
    van den Bergh HT; Owen CP; Howes DG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Oct; 132(4):749-754. PubMed ID: 36184310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and precision of occlusal contacts of stereolithographic casts mounted by digital interocclusal registrations.
    Krahenbuhl JT; Cho SH; Irelan J; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 27068319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation for two impression techniques.
    Parker MH; Cameron SM; Hughbanks JC; Reid DE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Sep; 78(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 9297641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4.
    Sonkesriya S; Subramanian D; Saha P; Roy P; Panda S; Reddy U; Baig MM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Dec; 24(12):936-939. PubMed ID: 38317389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models.
    Sweeney S; Smith DK; Messersmith M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 26232833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compressibility of two polyvinyl siloxane interocclusal record materials and its effect on mounted cast relationships.
    Campos AA; Nathanson D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Oct; 82(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 10512966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
    J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials-an in-vitro multi-centre study.
    Tejo SK; Kumar AG; Kattimani VS; Desai PD; Nalla S; Chaitanya K K
    Head Face Med; 2012 Oct; 8():27. PubMed ID: 23039395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of impression tray design upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a single-phase medium-bodied polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
    J Dent; 1992 Jun; 20(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 1624625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records.
    Vergos VK; Tripodakis AP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 12956489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials.
    Garg S; Kumar S; Jain S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug; 20(8):928-934. PubMed ID: 31797849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
    White AJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
    Tjan AH; Nemetz H; Nguyen LT; Contino R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 1403906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of complete-arch implant impression made with occlusal registration material.
    Papazoglou E; Wee AG; Carr AB; Urban I; Margaritis V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):143-148. PubMed ID: 31079882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional analysis of the accuracy of conventional and completely digital interocclusal registration methods.
    Ries JM; Grünler C; Wichmann M; Matta RE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):994-1000. PubMed ID: 33888327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Accuracy of Transferring Casts in Maximal Intercuspal Position to a Virtual Articulator.
    He M; Ding Q; Li L; Yang G; Zhao Y; Sun Y; Zhang L
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 34196456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
    Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
    Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.