109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36185133)
1. Surgical planning and finite element analysis for the neurocraneal protection in cranioplasty with PMMA: A case study.
Moncayo-Matute FP; Peña-Tapia PG; Vázquez-Silva E; Torres-Jara PB; Moya-Loaiza DP; Abad-Farfán G; Andrade-Galarza AF
Heliyon; 2022 Sep; 8(9):e10706. PubMed ID: 36185133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. FEM assisted evaluation of PMMA and Ti6Al4V as materials for cranioplasty resulting mechanical behaviour and the neurocranial protection.
Tsouknidas A; Maropoulos S; Savvakis S; Michailidis N
Biomed Mater Eng; 2011; 21(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 22072078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite Element Analysis of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Cranial Implant Manufactured with PMMA and PEEK: A Mechanical Comparative Study.
Moncayo-Matute FP; Vázquez-Silva E; Peña-Tapia PG; Torres-Jara PB; Moya-Loaiza DP; Viloria-Ávila TJ
Polymers (Basel); 2023 Sep; 15(17):. PubMed ID: 37688247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design of 3D Additively Manufactured Hybrid Structures for Cranioplasty.
De Santis R; Russo T; Rau JV; Papallo I; Martorelli M; Gloria A
Materials (Basel); 2021 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 33401673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration.
da Silva Júnior EB; de Aragão AH; de Paula Loureiro M; Lobo CS; Oliveti AF; de Oliveira RM; Ramina R
3D Print Med; 2021 Feb; 7(1):4. PubMed ID: 33548008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low-cost customized cranioplasty using a 3D digital printing model: a case report.
De La Peña A; De La Peña-Brambila J; Pérez-De La Torre J; Ochoa M; Gallardo GJ
3D Print Med; 2018; 4(1):4. PubMed ID: 29782609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cranioplasty With a Customized Polymethylmethacrylate Implant Using a 3D Printer.
Gorripati JP; Godbole Dubey SA
Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50830. PubMed ID: 38249233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early experience with patient-specific low-cost 3D-printed polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty implants in a lower-middle-income-country: Technical note and economic analysis.
Ashraf M; Choudhary N; Kamboh UA; Raza MA; Sultan KA; Ghulam N; Hussain SS; Ashraf N
Surg Neurol Int; 2022; 13():270. PubMed ID: 35855120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design and manufacture of customized dental implants by using reverse engineering and selective laser melting technology.
Chen J; Zhang Z; Chen X; Zhang C; Zhang G; Xu Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1088-95.e1. PubMed ID: 24939253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical testing of alloplastic PMMA cranioplasty materials.
Eppley BL
J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 16(1):140-3. PubMed ID: 15699662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structural and mechanical implications of PMMA implant shape and interface geometry in cranioplasty--A finite element study.
Ridwan-Pramana A; Marcián P; Borák L; Narra N; Forouzanfar T; Wolff J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 44(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 26646634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cranioplasty with polymethylmethacrylate prostheses fabricated by hand using original bone flaps: Technical note and surgical outcomes.
Caro-Osorio E; De la Garza-Ramos R; Martínez-Sánchez SR; Olazarán-Salinas F
Surg Neurol Int; 2013; 4():136. PubMed ID: 24232827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Patient-Specific Cranial Implant Design Using Finite Element Analysis.
Huys SEF; Van Gysel A; Mommaerts MY; Sloten JV
World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():198-204. PubMed ID: 33529765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Custom-designed orthopedic implants evaluated using finite element analysis of patient-specific computed tomography data: femoral-component case study.
Harrysson OL; Hosni YA; Nayfeh JF
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Sep; 8():91. PubMed ID: 17854508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical performance of cranial implants with different thicknesses and material properties: A finite element study.
Marcián P; Narra N; Borák L; Chamrad J; Wolff J
Comput Biol Med; 2019 Jun; 109():43-52. PubMed ID: 31035070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals.
Chamo D; Msallem B; Sharma N; Aghlmandi S; Kunz C; Thieringer FM
J Clin Med; 2020 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 32204321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis and comparison of wrist splint designs using the finite element method: Multi-material three-dimensional printing compared to typical existing practice with thermoplastics.
Cazon A; Kelly S; Paterson AM; Bibb RJ; Campbell RI
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Sep; 231(9):881-897. PubMed ID: 28689470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modification of PMMA Cements for Cranioplasty with Bioactive Glass and Copper Doped Tricalcium Phosphate Particles.
Russo T; De Santis R; Gloria A; Barbaro K; Altigeri A; Fadeeva IV; Rau JV
Polymers (Basel); 2019 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 31881672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Design and Additive Manufacturing of a Biomimetic Customized Cranial Implant Based on Voronoi Diagram.
Sharma N; Ostas D; Rotar H; Brantner P; Thieringer FM
Front Physiol; 2021; 12():647923. PubMed ID: 33897455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. X-ray computed tomography evaluations of additive manufactured multimaterial composites.
Curto M; Kao AP; Keeble W; Tozzi G; Barber AH
J Microsc; 2022 Mar; 285(3):131-143. PubMed ID: 34057229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
